Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Impact of abiotic factors on aggregation behaviour of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F16%3A33161820" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/16:33161820 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://academic.oup.com/mollus/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mollus/eyv033" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/mollus/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mollus/eyv033</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyv033" target="_blank" >10.1093/mollus/eyv033</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Impact of abiotic factors on aggregation behaviour of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Many bivalves exhibit contagious distribution, which reduces their exposure to environmental dangers including predation, dislodgement or desiccation, but at the cost of increasing intraspecific competition and waste accumulation. We studied the impact of depth (1 or 5 m), substratum (loose or solid), light (0 or 1000 lux), temperature (10-30 8C, every 5 8C) and water flow (0 or 8.7 cm s21) on aggregation forming in the gregarious byssate zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha in the field (the depth factor) and laboratory (the other factors). Mussels were more clustered at a shallower site, at intermediate temperatures (15-25 8C) and in running water. There was no significant effect of light on mussel aggregation. Greater initial distances between mussels reduced clumping to some extent, but not within 15-30 mm, suggesting that mussels can move actively towards conspecifics over such short distances. Mussels rarely formed druzes (groups of mussels attached to conspecifics) except for those tested on sand, which is unsuitable for attachment. In general, mussels grouped in the presence of potential dangers (shallow depth, running water, unsuitable substratum) and when unfavourable effects of clumping were lower (intermediate temperatures and water flow). However, they did not attach to each other unless other substrata were unavailable, suggesting that overcrowding was avoided when possible. Thus, mussel aggregation behaviour seems to be a compromise between the advantages and shortcomings of solitary and gregarious life, and may change depending on local environmental conditions.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Impact of abiotic factors on aggregation behaviour of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Many bivalves exhibit contagious distribution, which reduces their exposure to environmental dangers including predation, dislodgement or desiccation, but at the cost of increasing intraspecific competition and waste accumulation. We studied the impact of depth (1 or 5 m), substratum (loose or solid), light (0 or 1000 lux), temperature (10-30 8C, every 5 8C) and water flow (0 or 8.7 cm s21) on aggregation forming in the gregarious byssate zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha in the field (the depth factor) and laboratory (the other factors). Mussels were more clustered at a shallower site, at intermediate temperatures (15-25 8C) and in running water. There was no significant effect of light on mussel aggregation. Greater initial distances between mussels reduced clumping to some extent, but not within 15-30 mm, suggesting that mussels can move actively towards conspecifics over such short distances. Mussels rarely formed druzes (groups of mussels attached to conspecifics) except for those tested on sand, which is unsuitable for attachment. In general, mussels grouped in the presence of potential dangers (shallow depth, running water, unsuitable substratum) and when unfavourable effects of clumping were lower (intermediate temperatures and water flow). However, they did not attach to each other unless other substrata were unavailable, suggesting that overcrowding was avoided when possible. Thus, mussel aggregation behaviour seems to be a compromise between the advantages and shortcomings of solitary and gregarious life, and may change depending on local environmental conditions.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    EG - Zoologie

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Molluscan Studies

  • ISSN

    0260-1230

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    82

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    12

  • Strana od-do

    55 - 66

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000370301100007

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus