Comparison of two methods for sampling orthopterans in grassland: differences in species representation and sex ratios.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F17%3A73585096" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/17:73585096 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/issues/zoo-17-41-6/zoo-41-6-18-1701-10.pdf" target="_blank" >http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/issues/zoo-17-41-6/zoo-41-6-18-1701-10.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1701-10" target="_blank" >10.3906/zoo-1701-10</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of two methods for sampling orthopterans in grassland: differences in species representation and sex ratios.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Orthopterans are convenient indicators for threatened grassland ecosystems. Many sampling methods are known; among them, sweep netting is the most common. This study compares sweep netting with less common pan trapping and quantifies differences in species representation and sex ratio between the two sampling techniques. Sampling took place in the submontane grassland in the northeastern part of the Czech Republic (Central Europe) during July, August, and September 2010. Both sweep netting and pan trapping were used concurrently in 11 meadows. Sampled orthopteran adults were determined to the species level and their sex was noted. Both methods recorded the same pool of 14 species. A chi-squared test showed significant differences in representation of 7 out of 8 analyzed species in sweep-net and pan-trap samples. Sex ratios also noticeably differed. Possible causes of the differences are discussed. This study showed that pan trapping is a solid alternative to sweep netting.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of two methods for sampling orthopterans in grassland: differences in species representation and sex ratios.

Popis výsledku anglicky

Orthopterans are convenient indicators for threatened grassland ecosystems. Many sampling methods are known; among them, sweep netting is the most common. This study compares sweep netting with less common pan trapping and quantifies differences in species representation and sex ratio between the two sampling techniques. Sampling took place in the submontane grassland in the northeastern part of the Czech Republic (Central Europe) during July, August, and September 2010. Both sweep netting and pan trapping were used concurrently in 11 meadows. Sampled orthopteran adults were determined to the species level and their sex was noted. Both methods recorded the same pool of 14 species. A chi-squared test showed significant differences in representation of 7 out of 8 analyzed species in sweep-net and pan-trap samples. Sex ratios also noticeably differed. Possible causes of the differences are discussed. This study showed that pan trapping is a solid alternative to sweep netting.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/SP%2F2D3%2F155%2F08" target="_blank" >SP/2D3/155/08: Optimalizace ekologického zemědělství a vybraných agroenvironmentálních opatření s důrazem na ochranu přírody a krajiny</a><br>

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Turkish Journal of Zoology

ISSN

1300-0179

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

41

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

TR - Turecká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

1105-1110

Kód UT WoS článku

000418289800018

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—