Spatial Patterns in Fiscal Impacts of Environmental Taxation in the EU
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F20%3A73604355" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/20:73604355 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/26867184:_____/20:N0000004
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/104" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/104</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/economies8040104" target="_blank" >10.3390/economies8040104</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Spatial Patterns in Fiscal Impacts of Environmental Taxation in the EU
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
There are several reasons for environmental taxation implementation. Besides its environmental impact, the main reason for such taxation is its fiscal impact, particularly in generating revenues of public budgets. The main goal of this paper is to observe possible spatial patterns in fiscal impacts of environmental taxation in the EU countries, and to depict the groups of countries with the same (or similar) fiscal impact of these instruments on public budget revenues, including environmental and economic characteristics. Two methods of cluster analysis are used, Ward linkage and K-nearest neighbors (spatial) cluster analysis to observe potential geographical links or implication of fiscal impact. The study is performed for the years 2008 and 2017. Based on the results, we can say that in the year 2008, the EU countries were divided into "the west" and "the east", with some exceptions. The western countries were characterized by high environmental tax revenues, the eastern countries by low environmental tax revenues. For 2017, the situation is different. The border between old and new EU member states is not so abrupt and clear. The results show higher diversification between EU countries concerning the fiscal impacts of environmental taxation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Spatial Patterns in Fiscal Impacts of Environmental Taxation in the EU
Popis výsledku anglicky
There are several reasons for environmental taxation implementation. Besides its environmental impact, the main reason for such taxation is its fiscal impact, particularly in generating revenues of public budgets. The main goal of this paper is to observe possible spatial patterns in fiscal impacts of environmental taxation in the EU countries, and to depict the groups of countries with the same (or similar) fiscal impact of these instruments on public budget revenues, including environmental and economic characteristics. Two methods of cluster analysis are used, Ward linkage and K-nearest neighbors (spatial) cluster analysis to observe potential geographical links or implication of fiscal impact. The study is performed for the years 2008 and 2017. Based on the results, we can say that in the year 2008, the EU countries were divided into "the west" and "the east", with some exceptions. The western countries were characterized by high environmental tax revenues, the eastern countries by low environmental tax revenues. For 2017, the situation is different. The border between old and new EU member states is not so abrupt and clear. The results show higher diversification between EU countries concerning the fiscal impacts of environmental taxation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Economies
ISSN
2227-7099
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
8
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
1-18
Kód UT WoS článku
000601452900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
999