Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Fluxes between Conventional and Conserved Irrigated Rice Paddy Fields in Myanmar
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F20%3A73605291" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/20:73605291 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5798/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5798/htm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145798" target="_blank" >10.3390/su12145798</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Fluxes between Conventional and Conserved Irrigated Rice Paddy Fields in Myanmar
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Rice (Oryza sativa. L.), a major food crop widely grown in Myanmar, is the most prominent cause of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. Moreover, as a result of modification in agricultural management practices (such as soil tillage), the soil organic matter is exposed to more oxidizing conditions, releasing CO(2)into the environment, contributing to global warming. Therefore, we studied the effects of both conventional and conservation soil tillage management practices on CO(2)fluxes on an experimental rice paddy field in Myanmar. Total CO(2)emissions during the night from paddies farmed under conventional practices were significantly higher than those from paddies farmed under conservation practices; however, no net CO(2)flux differences were found between practices. Total net CO(2)fluxes ranged from -59 to 1614 mg CO(2)m(-2)h(-1)in conventional practices and from -282 to 1082 mg CO(2)m(-2)h(-1)in conservation practices, respectively. Significantly higher rice biomass and grain yields were observed in conventional practices when compared to those in conservation practices, causing a significant rise in both CO(2)uptake and emissions during the day and night, respectively. In addition, the results of this study revealed that CO(2)emissions in rice fields could be much higher than expected, requiring further study to elucidate key factors driving the dynamics of CO(2)in rice paddy systems.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Fluxes between Conventional and Conserved Irrigated Rice Paddy Fields in Myanmar
Popis výsledku anglicky
Rice (Oryza sativa. L.), a major food crop widely grown in Myanmar, is the most prominent cause of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. Moreover, as a result of modification in agricultural management practices (such as soil tillage), the soil organic matter is exposed to more oxidizing conditions, releasing CO(2)into the environment, contributing to global warming. Therefore, we studied the effects of both conventional and conservation soil tillage management practices on CO(2)fluxes on an experimental rice paddy field in Myanmar. Total CO(2)emissions during the night from paddies farmed under conventional practices were significantly higher than those from paddies farmed under conservation practices; however, no net CO(2)flux differences were found between practices. Total net CO(2)fluxes ranged from -59 to 1614 mg CO(2)m(-2)h(-1)in conventional practices and from -282 to 1082 mg CO(2)m(-2)h(-1)in conservation practices, respectively. Significantly higher rice biomass and grain yields were observed in conventional practices when compared to those in conservation practices, causing a significant rise in both CO(2)uptake and emissions during the day and night, respectively. In addition, the results of this study revealed that CO(2)emissions in rice fields could be much higher than expected, requiring further study to elucidate key factors driving the dynamics of CO(2)in rice paddy systems.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10618 - Ecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Sustainability
ISSN
2071-1050
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
14
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
"5798-1"-"5798-19"
Kód UT WoS článku
000555945400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85095713995