Experiences of Mental Health Practitioners after Clients' Suicide: a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F24%3A73626718" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/24:73626718 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/11000/experiences_of_mental_health_practitioners_after.10.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/11000/experiences_of_mental_health_practitioners_after.10.aspx</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00495" target="_blank" >10.11124/JBIES-23-00495</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Experiences of Mental Health Practitioners after Clients' Suicide: a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective:The objective of this qualitative systematic review is to understand the experiences of mental health practitioners after clients&apos; suicide.Introduction:Mental health practitioners inevitably encounter client suicide during their careers, which can significantly affect their personal lives and professional outcomes. A deeper understanding of mental health practitioners&apos; experiences in the aftermath of clients&apos; suicide is necessary to provide effective support and assist with adaptation to this situation.Inclusion criteria:This systematic review will consider qualitative studies that explore the experiences of mental health practitioners, including psychotherapists, psychiatrists, psychological counselors, clinical psychologists, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and social workers following clients&apos; suicide. Experiences may include emotional responses, coping strategies, changes in social relationships, and reflections on practice.Methods:This review will follow the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Bibliographia Medica &amp; Ccaron;echoslovaca, and Bibliographia Medica Slovaca. Gray literature sources will include Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Studies in English, Czech, Slovak, and Chinese will be assessed for inclusion regardless of publication date. Studies that are initially selected will be assessed for methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tool for qualitative studies. Then, findings with illustrations will be extracted for subsequent meta-aggregation and ConQual assessment. All the above steps will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers.Review registration:PROSPERO CRD42023410523

Název v anglickém jazyce

Experiences of Mental Health Practitioners after Clients' Suicide: a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective:The objective of this qualitative systematic review is to understand the experiences of mental health practitioners after clients&apos; suicide.Introduction:Mental health practitioners inevitably encounter client suicide during their careers, which can significantly affect their personal lives and professional outcomes. A deeper understanding of mental health practitioners&apos; experiences in the aftermath of clients&apos; suicide is necessary to provide effective support and assist with adaptation to this situation.Inclusion criteria:This systematic review will consider qualitative studies that explore the experiences of mental health practitioners, including psychotherapists, psychiatrists, psychological counselors, clinical psychologists, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and social workers following clients&apos; suicide. Experiences may include emotional responses, coping strategies, changes in social relationships, and reflections on practice.Methods:This review will follow the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Bibliographia Medica &amp; Ccaron;echoslovaca, and Bibliographia Medica Slovaca. Gray literature sources will include Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Studies in English, Czech, Slovak, and Chinese will be assessed for inclusion regardless of publication date. Studies that are initially selected will be assessed for methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tool for qualitative studies. Then, findings with illustrations will be extracted for subsequent meta-aggregation and ConQual assessment. All the above steps will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers.Review registration:PROSPERO CRD42023410523

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50102 - Psychology, special (including therapy for learning, speech, hearing, visual and other physical and mental disabilities);

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

ISSN

2689-8381

e-ISSN

2689-8381

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

2387-2393

Kód UT WoS článku

001353442400006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85202514905