Phenomenology is not phenomenalism. Is there such a thing as phenomenology of sport?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F14%3A33150765" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/14:33150765 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.gymnica.upol.cz/index.php/gymnica/article/view/350/260" target="_blank" >http://www.gymnica.upol.cz/index.php/gymnica/article/view/350/260</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/ag.2014.012" target="_blank" >10.5507/ag.2014.012</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Phenomenology is not phenomenalism. Is there such a thing as phenomenology of sport?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: The application of the philosophical mode of investigation called "phenomenology" in the context of sport. Objective: The goal is to show how and why the phenomenological method is very often misused in the sportrelated research. Methods: Interpretation of the key texts, explanation of their meaning. Results: The confrontation of concrete sport-related texts with the original meaning of the key phenomenological notions shows mainly three types of misuse - the confusion of phenomenology withimmediacy, with an epistemologically subjectivist stance (phenomenalism), and with empirical research oriented towards objects in the world. Conclusions: Many of the discussed authors try to take over the epistemological validity of phenomenology for their research, which itself is not phenomenological, and it seems that this is because they lack such a methodological foundation. The authors believe that an authentically phenomenological analysis of sport is possible, but it must respect
Název v anglickém jazyce
Phenomenology is not phenomenalism. Is there such a thing as phenomenology of sport?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: The application of the philosophical mode of investigation called "phenomenology" in the context of sport. Objective: The goal is to show how and why the phenomenological method is very often misused in the sportrelated research. Methods: Interpretation of the key texts, explanation of their meaning. Results: The confrontation of concrete sport-related texts with the original meaning of the key phenomenological notions shows mainly three types of misuse - the confusion of phenomenology withimmediacy, with an epistemologically subjectivist stance (phenomenalism), and with empirical research oriented towards objects in the world. Conclusions: Many of the discussed authors try to take over the epistemological validity of phenomenology for their research, which itself is not phenomenological, and it seems that this is because they lack such a methodological foundation. The authors believe that an authentically phenomenological analysis of sport is possible, but it must respect
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.30.0041" target="_blank" >EE2.3.30.0041: Podpora vytváření excelentních výzkumných týmů a intersektorální mobility na Univerzitě Palackého v Olomouci II.</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Gymnica
ISSN
2336-4912
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
44
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
117-129
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—