Learning as differentiation of experiential schemas
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F20%3A73599337" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/20:73599337 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333179223" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333179223</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429298806" target="_blank" >10.4324/9780429298806</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Learning as differentiation of experiential schemas
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The goal of this chapter is to provide an interpretation of experiential learning that fully detaches itself from the epistemological presuppositions of empiricist and intellectualist accounts of learning. I first introduce the concept of schema as understood by Kant and I explain how it is related to the problems implied by the empiricist and intellectualist frameworks. I then interpret David Kolb’s theory of learning that is based on the concept of learning cycle and represents an attempt to overcome the corresponding drawbacks of these frameworks. I show that Kolb’s theory fails to achieve its goal because it is rooted in some of the fundamental epistemological presuppositions of these frameworks. Subsequently, I present a group of works from phenomenology, in particular Merleau-Ponty’s, in order to show that Kolb’s attempt is insufficient due to a lack of understanding of the problem expressed by Kant via the concept of schema. Finally, I outline an interpretation of experiential learning as differentiation of experiential schemas and explain how it meets the epistemological challenges outlined above.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Learning as differentiation of experiential schemas
Popis výsledku anglicky
The goal of this chapter is to provide an interpretation of experiential learning that fully detaches itself from the epistemological presuppositions of empiricist and intellectualist accounts of learning. I first introduce the concept of schema as understood by Kant and I explain how it is related to the problems implied by the empiricist and intellectualist frameworks. I then interpret David Kolb’s theory of learning that is based on the concept of learning cycle and represents an attempt to overcome the corresponding drawbacks of these frameworks. I show that Kolb’s theory fails to achieve its goal because it is rooted in some of the fundamental epistemological presuppositions of these frameworks. Subsequently, I present a group of works from phenomenology, in particular Merleau-Ponty’s, in order to show that Kolb’s attempt is insufficient due to a lack of understanding of the problem expressed by Kant via the concept of schema. Finally, I outline an interpretation of experiential learning as differentiation of experiential schemas and explain how it meets the epistemological challenges outlined above.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-19311S" target="_blank" >GA16-19311S: Modely tělesně zakotvené zkušenosti v teoretických základech zážitkové pedagogiky a jejích kinantropologických souvislostí</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Experiential Learning and Outdoor Education: Traditions of Practice and Philosophical Perspective
ISBN
978-0-367-27929-5
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
52-70
Počet stran knihy
134
Název nakladatele
Routledge
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
000488824300006