Effect of footwear versus barefoot on double-leg jump-landing and jump height measures: A randomized cross-over study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F23%3A73619599" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/23:73619599 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399122/" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399122/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.81107" target="_blank" >10.26603/001c.81107</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effect of footwear versus barefoot on double-leg jump-landing and jump height measures: A randomized cross-over study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

BackgroundAssessing individuals in their own athletic footwear in clinics is common, but can affect movement, performance, and clinical measures.PurposeThe aim was to compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, injury risk categorization, specific LESS errors, and jump heights between habitual athletic footwear and barefoot conditions.Study designRandomized cross-over laboratory study.MethodsEighty healthy individuals (55% male) completed the LESS following standard procedures (i.e., land from a 30-cm box to a distance of 50% of body height and then jump upwards maximally). Participants performed the LESS three times in two randomized conditions: footwear and barefoot. LESS data were extracted from 2D videos to compare group-level mean LESS scores, group-level and individual-level injury risk categorization (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights between conditions.ResultsLESS scores were significantly greater (0.3 errors, p=0.022) and jump heights were significantly lower (0.6 cm, p=0.029) in footwear than barefoot, but differences were trivial (d = 0.18 and -0.07, respectively) and not clinically meaningful. Although the number of high injury-risk participants was not statistically different at a group level (p=1.000); 27 individuals (33.8%) exhibited a clinically meaningful difference between conditions of one error or more in LESS score, categorization was inconsistent for 16.3% of individuals, and four of the 17 landing errors significantly differed between conditions.ConclusionAt a group level, habitual athletic footwear does not meaningfully influence LESS scores, risk categorization, or jump height. At an individual level, footwear can meaningfully affect LESS scores, risk categorization, and alter landing strategies. Use of consistent protocol and footwear is advised for assessing movement patterns and injury risk from the LESS given the unknown predictive value of this test barefoot.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effect of footwear versus barefoot on double-leg jump-landing and jump height measures: A randomized cross-over study

Popis výsledku anglicky

BackgroundAssessing individuals in their own athletic footwear in clinics is common, but can affect movement, performance, and clinical measures.PurposeThe aim was to compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, injury risk categorization, specific LESS errors, and jump heights between habitual athletic footwear and barefoot conditions.Study designRandomized cross-over laboratory study.MethodsEighty healthy individuals (55% male) completed the LESS following standard procedures (i.e., land from a 30-cm box to a distance of 50% of body height and then jump upwards maximally). Participants performed the LESS three times in two randomized conditions: footwear and barefoot. LESS data were extracted from 2D videos to compare group-level mean LESS scores, group-level and individual-level injury risk categorization (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights between conditions.ResultsLESS scores were significantly greater (0.3 errors, p=0.022) and jump heights were significantly lower (0.6 cm, p=0.029) in footwear than barefoot, but differences were trivial (d = 0.18 and -0.07, respectively) and not clinically meaningful. Although the number of high injury-risk participants was not statistically different at a group level (p=1.000); 27 individuals (33.8%) exhibited a clinically meaningful difference between conditions of one error or more in LESS score, categorization was inconsistent for 16.3% of individuals, and four of the 17 landing errors significantly differed between conditions.ConclusionAt a group level, habitual athletic footwear does not meaningfully influence LESS scores, risk categorization, or jump height. At an individual level, footwear can meaningfully affect LESS scores, risk categorization, and alter landing strategies. Use of consistent protocol and footwear is advised for assessing movement patterns and injury risk from the LESS given the unknown predictive value of this test barefoot.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy

ISSN

2159-2896

e-ISSN

2159-2896

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

"845 "- 855

Kód UT WoS článku

000000000000000

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85166760504