Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Credit Contract and Lending Contract in the Context of the New Czech Civil Code - Selected Issues

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F18%3A43913779" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/18:43913779 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://ece.mendelu.cz/wcd/w-rek-ece/ece2018_fin.pdf" target="_blank" >http://ece.mendelu.cz/wcd/w-rek-ece/ece2018_fin.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Credit Contract and Lending Contract in the Context of the New Czech Civil Code - Selected Issues

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Credit contract and lending contract represent to two related contract types regulated by the 2012 Czech Civil Code. Nevertheless, the lending contract differs from the credit contract in several aspects. Whereas the subject-matter of the credit contract can be only provision of money, the subject-matter of the lending contract may include - beside lending of money - various other fungible goods. Credits are always interest-bearing, lending can be both interest-bearing or interest-free. The credit contract is a consensual contract which is formed already by its closing, whereas the lending contract is a real contract and is formed only by provision or delivery or of the goods provided to the lender (debtor). The aim of the paper is to analyse selected issues from the existing legislation, especially the position of the contracting parties within the contractual types given. In the framework of the examination, we provide a comparison of the conceptual features of these closely related contract types from the point of view of the grantor. Also examined will be the space of contractual freedom provided by the legal rules and/or whether there are limits to this freedom, e.g. performance provided to consumers. Key role in the defined juxtaposition plays the circumstance that among the essentials of the credit contract (as opposed to the lending contract) plays the determination of the amount of the lending, both in quantity and currency. The amount to that the credit provider is obliged to grant funds may be agreed in the contract as a fixed amount or as a defined credit limit, credit framework etc. There is no principal difference between the specification of the credit as a credit limit or as a fixed amount - the beneficiary is in both cases entitled to decide on the amount to that the credit will be taken.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Credit Contract and Lending Contract in the Context of the New Czech Civil Code - Selected Issues

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Credit contract and lending contract represent to two related contract types regulated by the 2012 Czech Civil Code. Nevertheless, the lending contract differs from the credit contract in several aspects. Whereas the subject-matter of the credit contract can be only provision of money, the subject-matter of the lending contract may include - beside lending of money - various other fungible goods. Credits are always interest-bearing, lending can be both interest-bearing or interest-free. The credit contract is a consensual contract which is formed already by its closing, whereas the lending contract is a real contract and is formed only by provision or delivery or of the goods provided to the lender (debtor). The aim of the paper is to analyse selected issues from the existing legislation, especially the position of the contracting parties within the contractual types given. In the framework of the examination, we provide a comparison of the conceptual features of these closely related contract types from the point of view of the grantor. Also examined will be the space of contractual freedom provided by the legal rules and/or whether there are limits to this freedom, e.g. performance provided to consumers. Key role in the defined juxtaposition plays the circumstance that among the essentials of the credit contract (as opposed to the lending contract) plays the determination of the amount of the lending, both in quantity and currency. The amount to that the credit provider is obliged to grant funds may be agreed in the contract as a fixed amount or as a defined credit limit, credit framework etc. There is no principal difference between the specification of the credit as a credit limit or as a fixed amount - the beneficiary is in both cases entitled to decide on the amount to that the credit will be taken.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Enterprise and Competitive Environment: Conference Proceedings

  • ISBN

    978-80-7509-561-9

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    neuvedeno

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    434-444

  • Název nakladatele

    Mendelova univerzita v Brně

  • Místo vydání

    Brno

  • Místo konání akce

    Brno

  • Datum konání akce

    22. 3. 2018

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku