Sovereignty in the Digital Age - How Can We Measure Digital Sovereignty and Support the EU's Action Plan?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F22%3A43920511" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/22:43920511 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2021-0015" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2021-0015</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2021-0015" target="_blank" >10.1515/ngs-2021-0015</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sovereignty in the Digital Age - How Can We Measure Digital Sovereignty and Support the EU's Action Plan?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the states of the European Union (EU), the question currently being asked is to what extent dependence on technologies from the USA and China will have a lasting impact on state sovereignty. The term digital sovereignty stands for the EU&apos;s desire to compensate for the deficits of the past decades, which were caused by an insufficient development of the location for software and hardware development. Autocratic states use the path of digital autarky, the USA a path of liberalization and high degrees of openness. In the EU, on the other hand, regulation, data protection, and liberal values developed over centuries play a major role in the less pronounced IT development. The path of European states to more digital sovereignty has been addressed politically as an &quot;action plan,&quot;but there is still no common understanding or definition of what digital sovereignty exactly means. There is a lack of a target and a measurable index as well as evaluated measures derived from it. Based on a historical derivation, this article proposes a definition for European digital sovereignty and the formation of an index. The index needs to be further scientifically elaborated for applicability.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sovereignty in the Digital Age - How Can We Measure Digital Sovereignty and Support the EU's Action Plan?

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the states of the European Union (EU), the question currently being asked is to what extent dependence on technologies from the USA and China will have a lasting impact on state sovereignty. The term digital sovereignty stands for the EU&apos;s desire to compensate for the deficits of the past decades, which were caused by an insufficient development of the location for software and hardware development. Autocratic states use the path of digital autarky, the USA a path of liberalization and high degrees of openness. In the EU, on the other hand, regulation, data protection, and liberal values developed over centuries play a major role in the less pronounced IT development. The path of European states to more digital sovereignty has been addressed politically as an &quot;action plan,&quot;but there is still no common understanding or definition of what digital sovereignty exactly means. There is a lack of a target and a measurable index as well as evaluated measures derived from it. Based on a historical derivation, this article proposes a definition for European digital sovereignty and the formation of an index. The index needs to be further scientifically elaborated for applicability.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

New Global Studies

ISSN

1940-0004

e-ISSN

1940-0004

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

275-299

Kód UT WoS článku

000889330700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85118223420