Erosion and the Economic Evaluation of the Conservation Grassland as an Existing Effective Tool to Reduce Erosion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43110%2F23%3A43923668" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43110/23:43923668 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/62156489:43210/23:43923668

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun.2023.010" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun.2023.010</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun.2023.010" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun.2023.010</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Erosion and the Economic Evaluation of the Conservation Grassland as an Existing Effective Tool to Reduce Erosion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Problem with soil erosion has not yet been satisfactorily solved with a holistic approach through a precisely targeted and duly explained strategic plan in the Czech Republic. Even though there are effective means to undertake needed measures, conservation grassland being one of them. The research aims to contribute to the debate that concerns battling soil erosion in Czech conditions. The idea of conservation grassland as an effective tool to battle soil erosion is well-known by the experts and farmers alike. Although there has been a discussion on what should be the extent of conservation grassland on a country-level in Czech conditions, there still has not been enough vigour to push the idea forth. We set two research questions. Firstly, what should be the total volume of agricultural land that should undergo the conservation grassland. Secondly, how to adjust subsidy scheme for making the conservation grassland as erosion protection economically viable for the farmers. We provide answers with holistic analysis of all Land Parcel Blocks (LPB) in 2016-2021 period where the erosion events were analysed, and the Erosion Hazard Classes (TEO) were considered too. We concluded that if we take into the account a five-year project according to 2023-2027 Common Agricultural Policy scheme, more than CZK 3.4 billion worth of soil could be saved if 103,428.4 hectares were grassed. For a conventional farmer, additional subsidy scheme would have to be presented to compensate farmer&apos;s expenses for implementing the conservation grassland that secures an anti-erosion ecosystem service and other ecosystem services as well.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Erosion and the Economic Evaluation of the Conservation Grassland as an Existing Effective Tool to Reduce Erosion

Popis výsledku anglicky

Problem with soil erosion has not yet been satisfactorily solved with a holistic approach through a precisely targeted and duly explained strategic plan in the Czech Republic. Even though there are effective means to undertake needed measures, conservation grassland being one of them. The research aims to contribute to the debate that concerns battling soil erosion in Czech conditions. The idea of conservation grassland as an effective tool to battle soil erosion is well-known by the experts and farmers alike. Although there has been a discussion on what should be the extent of conservation grassland on a country-level in Czech conditions, there still has not been enough vigour to push the idea forth. We set two research questions. Firstly, what should be the total volume of agricultural land that should undergo the conservation grassland. Secondly, how to adjust subsidy scheme for making the conservation grassland as erosion protection economically viable for the farmers. We provide answers with holistic analysis of all Land Parcel Blocks (LPB) in 2016-2021 period where the erosion events were analysed, and the Erosion Hazard Classes (TEO) were considered too. We concluded that if we take into the account a five-year project according to 2023-2027 Common Agricultural Policy scheme, more than CZK 3.4 billion worth of soil could be saved if 103,428.4 hectares were grassed. For a conventional farmer, additional subsidy scheme would have to be presented to compensate farmer&apos;s expenses for implementing the conservation grassland that secures an anti-erosion ecosystem service and other ecosystem services as well.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50206 - Finance

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

ISSN

1211-8516

e-ISSN

2464-8310

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

141-153

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85165116070