Indicators used for assessment of the ecological dimension of sustainable arable farming - review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F11%3A00173673" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/11:00173673 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Indicators used for assessment of the ecological dimension of sustainable arable farming - review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper reviews the basic indicators for arable farming sustainability assessment, analyses depth of detail, way of calculation, input data intensity, expression of the result and its evaluation. Focus is on indicators of nutrients, organic matter andenergy balance, use of pesticides, soil protection and biodiversity, which we consider as basic issues from environmental and agronomic viewpoint. It is important to fi nd a compromise between exactness of calculation and feasibility of input data. It also appears that risk of errors at using a method increases with its complexity. According to experience from practice, indicators based on assessment of environmental impacts of management are preferred to the indicators based on evaluation of farmer practices, although the need for input data is higher. The link with the objectives for this kind of indicators is direct and the choice of intervention is left to the farmer. Indicators allowing expression of the impact per unit area as wel

Název v anglickém jazyce

Indicators used for assessment of the ecological dimension of sustainable arable farming - review

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper reviews the basic indicators for arable farming sustainability assessment, analyses depth of detail, way of calculation, input data intensity, expression of the result and its evaluation. Focus is on indicators of nutrients, organic matter andenergy balance, use of pesticides, soil protection and biodiversity, which we consider as basic issues from environmental and agronomic viewpoint. It is important to fi nd a compromise between exactness of calculation and feasibility of input data. It also appears that risk of errors at using a method increases with its complexity. According to experience from practice, indicators based on assessment of environmental impacts of management are preferred to the indicators based on evaluation of farmer practices, although the need for input data is higher. The link with the objectives for this kind of indicators is direct and the choice of intervention is left to the farmer. Indicators allowing expression of the impact per unit area as wel

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GC - Pěstování rostlin, osevní postupy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QH92242" target="_blank" >QH92242: Indikátory a postupy hodnocení trvalé udržitelnosti systémů rostlinné produkce v podmínkách ČR</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

ISSN

1211-8516

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

LIX

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

247-256

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—