The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F14%3A00229742" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/14:00229742 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of the study was to define which kinds of weeds were occurred in selected vineyards in Žabčice and evaluated the differences in weed infestation in vineyards with different management. The first vineyard was divided to three parts: grassed spacebetween rows, the part close to the vine trunk and cultivated space between rows. In this vineyard were done common works in growing season (cutting, etc.) and herbicides were applied. In the second vineyard were cultivated spaces between rows left to spontaneous grassing, application of herbicides was limited and common works in growing season weren't done. The evaluation was taken by phytocenological reléves in years 2013 and 2014. Obtained data were processed by multivariate analysis of ecological data. The most common species in the first vineyard were Bromus ordeaceus, Bromus inermis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Elytrigia repens, Erodium cicutarium, Euphorbia cyparissias, Fallopia convolvulus, Galium aparine, Geranium pusillum, Geum urb

Název v anglickém jazyce

The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of the study was to define which kinds of weeds were occurred in selected vineyards in Žabčice and evaluated the differences in weed infestation in vineyards with different management. The first vineyard was divided to three parts: grassed spacebetween rows, the part close to the vine trunk and cultivated space between rows. In this vineyard were done common works in growing season (cutting, etc.) and herbicides were applied. In the second vineyard were cultivated spaces between rows left to spontaneous grassing, application of herbicides was limited and common works in growing season weren't done. The evaluation was taken by phytocenological reléves in years 2013 and 2014. Obtained data were processed by multivariate analysis of ecological data. The most common species in the first vineyard were Bromus ordeaceus, Bromus inermis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Elytrigia repens, Erodium cicutarium, Euphorbia cyparissias, Fallopia convolvulus, Galium aparine, Geranium pusillum, Geum urb

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

GC - Pěstování rostlin, osevní postupy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QI111A184" target="_blank" >QI111A184: Optimalizace metod regulace zaplevelení v systému precizního zemědělství</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

MendelNet 2014 - Proceedings of International PhD Students Conference

ISBN

978-80-7509-174-1

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

90-94

Název nakladatele

Mendel University in Brno

Místo vydání

Brno, Czech Republic

Místo konání akce

Brno, Czech Republic

Datum konání akce

19. 11. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—