Composted biochar versus compost with biochar: effects on soil properties and plant growth

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F24%3A43925880" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/24:43925880 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00379-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00379-2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00379-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s42773-024-00379-2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Composted biochar versus compost with biochar: effects on soil properties and plant growth

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Biochar is widely recognized as an amendment that enhances soil properties and sequesters carbon, particularly in degraded soils. However, biochar applied solely to soil may also hinder plant development due to toxic by-products generated during pyrolysis or nutrient retention. To mitigate these adverse effects, it has been suggested to either mix biochar with compost or to process it by composting with fresh organic materials. To date, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating the performance of these two approaches. In this study, three types of biochar, differing in their initial feedstocks (beech wood, hornbeam/beech/oak mixture, and digestate/cereal straw mixture), were investigated. These biochars were applied solely, mixed with green waste compost, or processed as composted biochar in two soils of different fertility (a Luvisol and a gleyic Fluvisol). A pot experiment was conducted under controlled conditions where lettuce was grown for three months. After harvesting, plant biomass, and soil microbial and physicochemical properties were measured. Composted biochar and compost additives maintained a neutral soil pH, contrary to biochar applied solely or mixed with compost. The dissolved organic carbon and total nitrogen were higher in composted biochar treatments, leading to a higher proportion of humified material with a high degree of condensed aromatic groups compared to other treatments. Microbial activities were higher in the composted biochar treatments compared to those in the compost with biochar, and more specifically in the less fertile Luvisol. Finally, composted biochar increased plant growth by almost six times compared to the control without amendments, whereas the mix of biochar and compost increased it by only three times. Solely applied biochars did not affect lettuce growth. This study demonstrates that biochar composting is more beneficial than mixing biochar with compost in terms of improving soil fertility and mitigating the negative effects associated with pure biochar application. The positive effects of composted biochar application on soil properties and plant growth are higher than biochar and compost co-application.The composting process lessened the initial properties&apos; differences among biochars differing in initial feedstock and physicochemical qualities.The beneficial effects of composted biochar on soil properties were more pronounced when applied to less fertile soils.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Composted biochar versus compost with biochar: effects on soil properties and plant growth

Popis výsledku anglicky

Biochar is widely recognized as an amendment that enhances soil properties and sequesters carbon, particularly in degraded soils. However, biochar applied solely to soil may also hinder plant development due to toxic by-products generated during pyrolysis or nutrient retention. To mitigate these adverse effects, it has been suggested to either mix biochar with compost or to process it by composting with fresh organic materials. To date, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating the performance of these two approaches. In this study, three types of biochar, differing in their initial feedstocks (beech wood, hornbeam/beech/oak mixture, and digestate/cereal straw mixture), were investigated. These biochars were applied solely, mixed with green waste compost, or processed as composted biochar in two soils of different fertility (a Luvisol and a gleyic Fluvisol). A pot experiment was conducted under controlled conditions where lettuce was grown for three months. After harvesting, plant biomass, and soil microbial and physicochemical properties were measured. Composted biochar and compost additives maintained a neutral soil pH, contrary to biochar applied solely or mixed with compost. The dissolved organic carbon and total nitrogen were higher in composted biochar treatments, leading to a higher proportion of humified material with a high degree of condensed aromatic groups compared to other treatments. Microbial activities were higher in the composted biochar treatments compared to those in the compost with biochar, and more specifically in the less fertile Luvisol. Finally, composted biochar increased plant growth by almost six times compared to the control without amendments, whereas the mix of biochar and compost increased it by only three times. Solely applied biochars did not affect lettuce growth. This study demonstrates that biochar composting is more beneficial than mixing biochar with compost in terms of improving soil fertility and mitigating the negative effects associated with pure biochar application. The positive effects of composted biochar application on soil properties and plant growth are higher than biochar and compost co-application.The composting process lessened the initial properties&apos; differences among biochars differing in initial feedstock and physicochemical qualities.The beneficial effects of composted biochar on soil properties were more pronounced when applied to less fertile soils.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40104 - Soil science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biochar

ISSN

2524-7867

e-ISSN

2524-7867

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SG - Singapurská republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

85

Kód UT WoS článku

001329914500001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85206360330