Soil scientific research methods used in archaeology - Promising soil biochemistry: A mini-review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F15%3A43906275" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/15:43906275 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063041417.pdf" target="_blank" >http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2015063041417.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563041417" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201563041417</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Soil scientific research methods used in archaeology - Promising soil biochemistry: A mini-review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This work seeks to review soil scientific methods that have been used and are still being used in archaeology. This review paper aims at emphasising the importance of soil science practice to archaeology thus adding a scientific analytical nature to thecultural nature of archaeology. Common methods (physical, chemical and biochemical) used to analyse archaeological soils and artefacts is touched on and their strengths and shortcomings duly noted to become the base for future research. Furthermore, theauthors made emphasis on distinctive excavating/sampling methods, biochemical analyses focused on distinctive features of plough-land and soil organic matter mineralization, Counter Immunoelectrophoresis (CEIP) method by the presence of proteins testing,carbon analyses such as carbon-14 dating techniques, soil phosphorus studies and geochemical analyses of hematite Fe2O3 and cinnabaryte HgS contents. It is obvious that, the future of archaeology is in the soil because the soil harbours

Název v anglickém jazyce

Soil scientific research methods used in archaeology - Promising soil biochemistry: A mini-review

Popis výsledku anglicky

This work seeks to review soil scientific methods that have been used and are still being used in archaeology. This review paper aims at emphasising the importance of soil science practice to archaeology thus adding a scientific analytical nature to thecultural nature of archaeology. Common methods (physical, chemical and biochemical) used to analyse archaeological soils and artefacts is touched on and their strengths and shortcomings duly noted to become the base for future research. Furthermore, theauthors made emphasis on distinctive excavating/sampling methods, biochemical analyses focused on distinctive features of plough-land and soil organic matter mineralization, Counter Immunoelectrophoresis (CEIP) method by the presence of proteins testing,carbon analyses such as carbon-14 dating techniques, soil phosphorus studies and geochemical analyses of hematite Fe2O3 and cinnabaryte HgS contents. It is obvious that, the future of archaeology is in the soil because the soil harbours

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-02453S" target="_blank" >GA15-02453S: Časně eneolitická příkopová ohrazení v Čechách. Interpretace jejich účelu a společenského významu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

ISSN

1211-8516

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

63

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1417-1426

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—