A comparative fiber morphological analysis of major agricultural residues (used or investigated) as feedstock in the pulp and paper industry

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F21%3A43920398" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/21:43920398 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.4.7935-7952" target="_blank" >https://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.4.7935-7952</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.4.7935-7952" target="_blank" >10.15376/biores.16.4.7935-7952</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A comparative fiber morphological analysis of major agricultural residues (used or investigated) as feedstock in the pulp and paper industry

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The suitabilities of major agricultural residues were assessed as papermaking feedstocks. All the examined agricultural residues were assumed as potential candidates for substituting hardwood fibers in mixed pulp blends from a fiber morphological perspective. Wheat, barley, rice, rapeseed, maize, sunflower, sugarcane bagasse, coconut husk, and two genotypes of miscanthus grass underwent identical maceration. The fiber length, fiber width, cell wall thickness, and lumen diameter were measured to calculate the slenderness ratio, flexibility coefficient, and Runkel ratio. The average fiber length ranged from 0.50 mm +- 0.32 mm (MG-S-02-V) to 1.15 mm mm +- 0.58 mm (sugarcane bagasse). The fiber width ranged from 10.77 μm +- 3.28 μm (rice straw) to 22.99 mm +- 5.20 mm (sunflower stalk). The lumen diameter ranged from 4.52 μm +- 2.52 μm (rice straw) to 13.23 μm +- 4.87 μm (sunflower stalk). The cell wall thickness ranged from 3.02 μm +- 0.95 μm (rice straw) to 4.80 μm +- 1.48 μm (sunflower stalk). The slenderness ratio, flexibility coefficient, and Runkel ratio values ranged between 28.08 to 58.11, 37.97 to 60.8, and 0.62 to 1.68, respectively. Wheat, maize, rapeseed, sugarcane bagasse, and coconut husk were found to be appropriate residue sources for papermaking feedstocks.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A comparative fiber morphological analysis of major agricultural residues (used or investigated) as feedstock in the pulp and paper industry

Popis výsledku anglicky

The suitabilities of major agricultural residues were assessed as papermaking feedstocks. All the examined agricultural residues were assumed as potential candidates for substituting hardwood fibers in mixed pulp blends from a fiber morphological perspective. Wheat, barley, rice, rapeseed, maize, sunflower, sugarcane bagasse, coconut husk, and two genotypes of miscanthus grass underwent identical maceration. The fiber length, fiber width, cell wall thickness, and lumen diameter were measured to calculate the slenderness ratio, flexibility coefficient, and Runkel ratio. The average fiber length ranged from 0.50 mm +- 0.32 mm (MG-S-02-V) to 1.15 mm mm +- 0.58 mm (sugarcane bagasse). The fiber width ranged from 10.77 μm +- 3.28 μm (rice straw) to 22.99 mm +- 5.20 mm (sunflower stalk). The lumen diameter ranged from 4.52 μm +- 2.52 μm (rice straw) to 13.23 μm +- 4.87 μm (sunflower stalk). The cell wall thickness ranged from 3.02 μm +- 0.95 μm (rice straw) to 4.80 μm +- 1.48 μm (sunflower stalk). The slenderness ratio, flexibility coefficient, and Runkel ratio values ranged between 28.08 to 58.11, 37.97 to 60.8, and 0.62 to 1.68, respectively. Wheat, maize, rapeseed, sugarcane bagasse, and coconut husk were found to be appropriate residue sources for papermaking feedstocks.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20502 - Paper and wood

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BioResources

ISSN

1930-2126

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

7935-7952

Kód UT WoS článku

000748249200004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—