Comparison of laser diffraction method and hydrometer method for soil particle size distribution analysis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43410%2F21%3A43921271" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43410/21:43921271 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2021-0023" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2021-0023</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2021-0023" target="_blank" >10.2478/ahr-2021-0023</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of laser diffraction method and hydrometer method for soil particle size distribution analysis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article aims to present a comparative study of two methods used to determine the particle size distribution of fine and medium coarse soils. These methods are used to determine the grain size distribution curve in practice; however, for different purposes. The classical sedimentation method, based on the Stoke's sedimentation law (hydrometer, areometric, the Casagrande's method), standardized for a geotechnical classification of soils was compared with the laser diffraction method on the Mastersizer 3,000 analyser used for soil science purposes. The first comparison on nine samples showed significant differences, especially for larger fractions above 0.01 mm. All measured values of falls from laser diffraction analysis (LDA) showed higher values of all analysed fractions. It was also interesting to follow the trend between the tests for the preparation of conversion factors. The analysis also outlined the direction for further comparison. For the geotechnical use of the LDA, it will be necessary to take into account the sample preparation and processing before analysis.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of laser diffraction method and hydrometer method for soil particle size distribution analysis
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article aims to present a comparative study of two methods used to determine the particle size distribution of fine and medium coarse soils. These methods are used to determine the grain size distribution curve in practice; however, for different purposes. The classical sedimentation method, based on the Stoke's sedimentation law (hydrometer, areometric, the Casagrande's method), standardized for a geotechnical classification of soils was compared with the laser diffraction method on the Mastersizer 3,000 analyser used for soil science purposes. The first comparison on nine samples showed significant differences, especially for larger fractions above 0.01 mm. All measured values of falls from laser diffraction analysis (LDA) showed higher values of all analysed fractions. It was also interesting to follow the trend between the tests for the preparation of conversion factors. The analysis also outlined the direction for further comparison. For the geotechnical use of the LDA, it will be necessary to take into account the sample preparation and processing before analysis.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10303 - Particles and field physics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae
ISSN
1335-2563
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
49-55
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—