Propagation of selected pear and quince rootstocks by hardwood cuttings

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43510%2F16%3A43909734" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43510/16:43909734 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031211" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031211</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031211" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201664031211</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Propagation of selected pear and quince rootstocks by hardwood cuttings

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

As long as new rootstocks continue to be developed, there will always the need for new genotypes to be controlled and evaluated. Different rootstocks, different growth stimulators and different kinds of cuttings techniques were adopted for these experiments. In Experiment 1, the bases of cuttings were treated with the stimulators and part of them was also treated with heat before planting. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that cuttings treated with Rhizopon AA produced the best effect after heat treatment (with an overall average of 36.9 % of rooted cuttings). Pyrodwarf (78.7 %), Cydomalus (73.9 %) and Pyroplus (60.6 %) were the best performing rootstocks among the evaluated ones. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the influence of the date of harvesting the cuttings on rooting (comparisons were made between cuttings prepared in December [early] and March [late]). For BA29 rootstock cuttings, the best performance was attained by cuttings taken in March. The difference in rooting between March and December was 43.9 %. On the other hand, early harvested rootstocks (cuttings taken in December) for Cydomalus showed the best performance, with an 18.7 % difference between cuttings made in December and in March. In Experiment 3, the effect of chemical (phytohormone) stimulation and heat stimulations was compared. The best result was obtained by combinations of treatments without heat stimulations, when the cuttings were stored at 5oC and later treated with 0.25 % IBA in 50 % ethanol solution. The least rooting results, on the other hand, were observed in heat treated cuttings, in cuttings stimulated with IBA and subsequently with heat and in cuttings treated with a 3 cm radial cut at the base. Based on our findings we cannot prove clearly that heat stimulation and the phytohormones used have beneficial effects on rooting of especially new rootstock genotypes with an unknown propagation coefficient.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Propagation of selected pear and quince rootstocks by hardwood cuttings

Popis výsledku anglicky

As long as new rootstocks continue to be developed, there will always the need for new genotypes to be controlled and evaluated. Different rootstocks, different growth stimulators and different kinds of cuttings techniques were adopted for these experiments. In Experiment 1, the bases of cuttings were treated with the stimulators and part of them was also treated with heat before planting. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that cuttings treated with Rhizopon AA produced the best effect after heat treatment (with an overall average of 36.9 % of rooted cuttings). Pyrodwarf (78.7 %), Cydomalus (73.9 %) and Pyroplus (60.6 %) were the best performing rootstocks among the evaluated ones. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the influence of the date of harvesting the cuttings on rooting (comparisons were made between cuttings prepared in December [early] and March [late]). For BA29 rootstock cuttings, the best performance was attained by cuttings taken in March. The difference in rooting between March and December was 43.9 %. On the other hand, early harvested rootstocks (cuttings taken in December) for Cydomalus showed the best performance, with an 18.7 % difference between cuttings made in December and in March. In Experiment 3, the effect of chemical (phytohormone) stimulation and heat stimulations was compared. The best result was obtained by combinations of treatments without heat stimulations, when the cuttings were stored at 5oC and later treated with 0.25 % IBA in 50 % ethanol solution. The least rooting results, on the other hand, were observed in heat treated cuttings, in cuttings stimulated with IBA and subsequently with heat and in cuttings treated with a 3 cm radial cut at the base. Based on our findings we cannot prove clearly that heat stimulation and the phytohormones used have beneficial effects on rooting of especially new rootstock genotypes with an unknown propagation coefficient.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GC - Pěstování rostlin, osevní postupy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QJ1210036" target="_blank" >QJ1210036: Rozšíření sortimentu podnoží jádrovin a odrůd hrušní o nové, perspektivní podnože a netradiční asijské odrůdy hrušní odvozené od Pyrus pyrifolia NAKAI. a Pyrus ussuriensis MAXIM.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

ISSN

1211-8516

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

64

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1211-1217

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84990996546