Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43510%2F16%3A43910693" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43510/16:43910693 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/ahr-2016-0007" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/ahr-2016-0007</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ahr-2016-0007" target="_blank" >10.1515/ahr-2016-0007</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper investigates suitability of digital surface model for visibility analysis in GIS. In experiment there were analysed viewsheds from 14 observer points calculated on digital surface model, digital terrain model and its comparison to field survey. Data sources for the investigated models were LiDAR digital terrain model and LiDAR digital surface model with vegetation distributed by the Czech Administration for Land Surveying and Cadastre. The overlay method was used for comparing accuracy of models and the reference model was LiDAR digital surface model. Average equalities in comparison with LiDAR digital terrain model, ZABAGED model and field survey were 15.5 %, 17.3% and 20.9%, respectively.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper investigates suitability of digital surface model for visibility analysis in GIS. In experiment there were analysed viewsheds from 14 observer points calculated on digital surface model, digital terrain model and its comparison to field survey. Data sources for the investigated models were LiDAR digital terrain model and LiDAR digital surface model with vegetation distributed by the Czech Administration for Land Surveying and Cadastre. The overlay method was used for comparing accuracy of models and the reference model was LiDAR digital surface model. Average equalities in comparison with LiDAR digital terrain model, ZABAGED model and field survey were 15.5 %, 17.3% and 20.9%, respectively.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AL - Umění, architektura, kulturní dědictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae

ISSN

1338-5259

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

28-31

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—