Qualitative analysis of the Euroepan Union Members positions under the Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A_____%2F03%3A11100030" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:_____/03:11100030 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Qualitative analysis of the Euroepan Union Members positions under the Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform in 2003 represents the entry into the third phase of the CAP. The final shape of the reform packet is a result of a compromise between external and internal interests of the EU members. The external interests,such as the liberalization of the agricultural trade under the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and EU enlargement, represented a common platform that in principle did not creat a barrier between the member-s positions.On the other hand, internal interestsof the members affected significantly their positions. The most important internal interests may be classified as follows: the EU budget spending, level of farm subsidies, effects of the reform on farm employment, farm income,rural viability,consumers,environment, food safety or animal welfare.Positions of individual EU members were a function of the agricultural structures and competitiveness.Coalitions of the EU members were created during the reform negotiations:reform-liberal group

Název v anglickém jazyce

Qualitative analysis of the Euroepan Union Members positions under the Common Agricultural Policy Reform

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform in 2003 represents the entry into the third phase of the CAP. The final shape of the reform packet is a result of a compromise between external and internal interests of the EU members. The external interests,such as the liberalization of the agricultural trade under the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and EU enlargement, represented a common platform that in principle did not creat a barrier between the member-s positions.On the other hand, internal interestsof the members affected significantly their positions. The most important internal interests may be classified as follows: the EU budget spending, level of farm subsidies, effects of the reform on farm employment, farm income,rural viability,consumers,environment, food safety or animal welfare.Positions of individual EU members were a function of the agricultural structures and competitiveness.Coalitions of the EU members were created during the reform negotiations:reform-liberal group

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QC1140" target="_blank" >QC1140: Efektivnost hospodaření podniků v ekologických systémech a možnosti zvyšování jejich konkurenceschopnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2003

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Agricultural Economics

ISSN

0139-570X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

49

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

453-459

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—