Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Teachers’ subjective definition of a family - frequency conceptual analysis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18440%2F15%3A50002727" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18440/15:50002727 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/62690094:18610/15:50002727

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281500172X" target="_blank" >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281500172X</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    —

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Teachers’ subjective definition of a family - frequency conceptual analysis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The family as a topic is an essential part of primary school curriculum in the Czech Republic. The present study describes the expressions used by teachers (N=219) to define the term family and the possible implicit theories behind the definitions. A total of 513 expressions were used by the respondents to define family, the ten most frequent ones being: člověk, ten, dítě, skupina, spolu, žít, blízký, rodič, my a rád (man/human being, this, child, group, together, live, close, parent, we and like). The initial analysis suggests that the teachers’ implicit understanding of the concept of family is associated with 1) parenthood and blood kinship, 2) emotional relations (love each other), 3) the co-existence in the household. The teachers’ implicit understanding is based on egocentric and pedocentric view (the family equals mainly me-child and my parents or me-parent and my children). The lexical trace makes it evident that the implicit understanding is deeply embodied in language (the expressions that occur to us are commonly used ones, which restricts the final concept) and that it reflects the changing socio-cultural discourse (for example, the modern concept of family is typically nuclear, based on partnership, which is a result of the postponement of parenthood, other phenomena include emancipation, economic independence, independent housing with variable individualized features, such as pets as a part of family structure). Czech teachers do not use in their definitions concepts like education, nation, culture or religion which sometimes appear in theoretical academic concepts of family

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Teachers’ subjective definition of a family - frequency conceptual analysis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The family as a topic is an essential part of primary school curriculum in the Czech Republic. The present study describes the expressions used by teachers (N=219) to define the term family and the possible implicit theories behind the definitions. A total of 513 expressions were used by the respondents to define family, the ten most frequent ones being: člověk, ten, dítě, skupina, spolu, žít, blízký, rodič, my a rád (man/human being, this, child, group, together, live, close, parent, we and like). The initial analysis suggests that the teachers’ implicit understanding of the concept of family is associated with 1) parenthood and blood kinship, 2) emotional relations (love each other), 3) the co-existence in the household. The teachers’ implicit understanding is based on egocentric and pedocentric view (the family equals mainly me-child and my parents or me-parent and my children). The lexical trace makes it evident that the implicit understanding is deeply embodied in language (the expressions that occur to us are commonly used ones, which restricts the final concept) and that it reflects the changing socio-cultural discourse (for example, the modern concept of family is typically nuclear, based on partnership, which is a result of the postponement of parenthood, other phenomena include emancipation, economic independence, independent housing with variable individualized features, such as pets as a part of family structure). Czech teachers do not use in their definitions concepts like education, nation, culture or religion which sometimes appear in theoretical academic concepts of family

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

    —

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0209" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0209: Rozvoj a podpora multidisciplinárního vědecko výzkumného týmu pro studium současné rodiny na UHK</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2015

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Procedia - social and behavioral sciences

  • ISBN

    —

  • ISSN

    1877-0428

  • e-ISSN

    neuvedeno

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    425-432

  • Název nakladatele

    Elsevier

  • Místo vydání

    Amsterdam

  • Místo konání akce

    Kyrenia

  • Datum konání akce

    22. 10. 2014

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000380543800059