An exploratory study investigating the perception that ICT capital projects are different: Evidence from the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F14%3A50002568" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/14:50002568 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0218" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0218</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0218" target="_blank" >10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0218</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

An exploratory study investigating the perception that ICT capital projects are different: Evidence from the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The empirical findings support the literature in that information and communication technology (ICT) projects are, in many respects, different from non-ICT projects. However, the evidence indicates that, in practice, there is no significant difference inthe financial and risk assessment models used in their appraisal. This indicates that any perceived difficulties, which may infer that the projects are ?different?, are overcome (or ignored), to some extent, when it comes to the formal financial and risk assessment stage of project appraisal. There is also evidence to suggest that practitioners use assessment models that academics regard as unsophisticated. The findings also show that strategic issues are more important with respect of ICT projects than non-ICT projects. The research therefore supports the view that ICT projects are perceived to be different, but that the current conventional (financial and risk) appraisal models are adequate to appraise such capital projects, provided

Název v anglickém jazyce

An exploratory study investigating the perception that ICT capital projects are different: Evidence from the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The empirical findings support the literature in that information and communication technology (ICT) projects are, in many respects, different from non-ICT projects. However, the evidence indicates that, in practice, there is no significant difference inthe financial and risk assessment models used in their appraisal. This indicates that any perceived difficulties, which may infer that the projects are ?different?, are overcome (or ignored), to some extent, when it comes to the formal financial and risk assessment stage of project appraisal. There is also evidence to suggest that practitioners use assessment models that academics regard as unsophisticated. The findings also show that strategic issues are more important with respect of ICT projects than non-ICT projects. The research therefore supports the view that ICT projects are perceived to be different, but that the current conventional (financial and risk) appraisal models are adequate to appraise such capital projects, provided

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Management research review

ISSN

2040-8269

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

912-927

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—