The Comparison of Prediction Ability of Selected Credibility Models in the Textile Industry in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F17%3A50013872" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/17:50013872 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://msed.vse.cz/msed_2017/sbornik/toc.html" target="_blank" >https://msed.vse.cz/msed_2017/sbornik/toc.html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Comparison of Prediction Ability of Selected Credibility Models in the Textile Industry in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Financial analysis presents one of the most important areas of interest in every successful company, where it can provide a huge amount of different indicators and models in areas of profitability, indebtedness, liquidity, and others. It is possible to use also some complex models, namely bankruptcy and credibility models, where these models usually provide one specific number and compare this number with recommended value. This article continues in the analysis of different models, as presented on previous IDSE conferences. This time, authors focus on credibility models, where several well-known models were selected for the analysis, namely Quick-test, IN 99, and Grünwald’s credibility index. The authors are evaluating one particular industry sector, namely Production of other textile, with the aim to compare the results of above mentioned models themselves, and to verify whether different models provide similar or different results. The data used for calculation have been obtained in database Albertina. Covered period of time is since 2011 to 2015. The results show that there exist differences between different models of financial analysis. More details are described in this article.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Comparison of Prediction Ability of Selected Credibility Models in the Textile Industry in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Financial analysis presents one of the most important areas of interest in every successful company, where it can provide a huge amount of different indicators and models in areas of profitability, indebtedness, liquidity, and others. It is possible to use also some complex models, namely bankruptcy and credibility models, where these models usually provide one specific number and compare this number with recommended value. This article continues in the analysis of different models, as presented on previous IDSE conferences. This time, authors focus on credibility models, where several well-known models were selected for the analysis, namely Quick-test, IN 99, and Grünwald’s credibility index. The authors are evaluating one particular industry sector, namely Production of other textile, with the aim to compare the results of above mentioned models themselves, and to verify whether different models provide similar or different results. The data used for calculation have been obtained in database Albertina. Covered period of time is since 2011 to 2015. The results show that there exist differences between different models of financial analysis. More details are described in this article.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
International days of statistics and economics 2017
ISBN
978-80-87990-12-4
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
761-770
Název nakladatele
Melandrium
Místo vydání
Slaný
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
14. 9. 2017
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000455325300076