A Two-dimensional Theory of Team Conflict
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F18%3A50015412" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/18:50015412 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Two-dimensional Theory of Team Conflict
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study explores current management perceptions regarding conflict within teams, specifically looking at those involved in the investment appraisal of capital projects. The research is in two stages. Stage 1 is based on a postal questionnaire survey relating to the appraisal of capital investments, addressed to large UK organisations. Stage 2 was conducted through semi-structured interviews, followed by a short-questionnaire. From the exploratory study, it was possible to identify and further investigate what the short-questionnaire respondents termed “personal” and “departmental” conflict, as well as what they perceived to be “good” (positive) conflict and “bad” (negative) conflict. It was perceived that controlled “departmental” conflict may lead to enhanced decision-making, while “personal” conflict may be destructive and lead to non-optimal decision-making. The research also identified the importance of the investment appraisal “procedure” and suggests that this may be one way of controlling conflict within teams. It theorises on a two-dimensional perception of team conflict: “departmental” and “personal” conflict and brings, up-to-date, current perceptions of team conflict.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Two-dimensional Theory of Team Conflict
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study explores current management perceptions regarding conflict within teams, specifically looking at those involved in the investment appraisal of capital projects. The research is in two stages. Stage 1 is based on a postal questionnaire survey relating to the appraisal of capital investments, addressed to large UK organisations. Stage 2 was conducted through semi-structured interviews, followed by a short-questionnaire. From the exploratory study, it was possible to identify and further investigate what the short-questionnaire respondents termed “personal” and “departmental” conflict, as well as what they perceived to be “good” (positive) conflict and “bad” (negative) conflict. It was perceived that controlled “departmental” conflict may lead to enhanced decision-making, while “personal” conflict may be destructive and lead to non-optimal decision-making. The research also identified the importance of the investment appraisal “procedure” and suggests that this may be one way of controlling conflict within teams. It theorises on a two-dimensional perception of team conflict: “departmental” and “personal” conflict and brings, up-to-date, current perceptions of team conflict.
Klasifikace
Druh
B - Odborná kniha
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50204 - Business and management
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
ISBN
978-613-9-84859-1
Počet stran knihy
67
Název nakladatele
LAP-Lambert academic publishing
Místo vydání
Saarbrücken
Kód UT WoS knihy
—