Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Economic analysis of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F18%3A50015463" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/18:50015463 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11160/18:10383386 RIV/00179906:_____/18:10383386

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S174870" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S174870</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S174870" target="_blank" >10.2147/NDT.S174870</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Economic analysis of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Acupuncture has become a viable option for migraine prophylaxis in Europe; however, despite its wide use, more data on the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness are needed when considering the perspectives of a paying third-party, the patient, and of society in general. The aim was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of adjuvant acupuncture to pharmacologic treatment vs pharmacologic treatment alone in migraine patients after a 3-month acupuncture course and a 6-month follow-up from all perspectives.Methods: The study involved an open-label randomized clinical trial of patients receiving acupuncture (n=42), and a waiting list control group (n=44). The number of migraine days during the last 28 days, as well as direct and indirect costs were considered. The trial was registered under DRKS00009803.Results: The total cost per patient reached (sic)696 vs (sic)285 after 3 months of acupuncture and (sic)66 vs (sic)132 in the acupuncture and control groups after a 6-month follow-up, respectively (P=0.071). The trends observed in effectiveness and costs from all perspectives are discussed.Conclusion: The inclusion of acupuncture in health care results beneficial mainly for its observed trend in reduced losses of productivity and income, with the latter often exceeding the costs of acupuncture treatment. As such, acupuncture may be recommended as an adjuvant treatment in migraine prophylaxis to standard pharmacotherapy.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Economic analysis of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Acupuncture has become a viable option for migraine prophylaxis in Europe; however, despite its wide use, more data on the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness are needed when considering the perspectives of a paying third-party, the patient, and of society in general. The aim was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of adjuvant acupuncture to pharmacologic treatment vs pharmacologic treatment alone in migraine patients after a 3-month acupuncture course and a 6-month follow-up from all perspectives.Methods: The study involved an open-label randomized clinical trial of patients receiving acupuncture (n=42), and a waiting list control group (n=44). The number of migraine days during the last 28 days, as well as direct and indirect costs were considered. The trial was registered under DRKS00009803.Results: The total cost per patient reached (sic)696 vs (sic)285 after 3 months of acupuncture and (sic)66 vs (sic)132 in the acupuncture and control groups after a 6-month follow-up, respectively (P=0.071). The trends observed in effectiveness and costs from all perspectives are discussed.Conclusion: The inclusion of acupuncture in health care results beneficial mainly for its observed trend in reduced losses of productivity and income, with the latter often exceeding the costs of acupuncture treatment. As such, acupuncture may be recommended as an adjuvant treatment in migraine prophylaxis to standard pharmacotherapy.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment

  • ISSN

    1178-2021

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    14

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    December

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NZ - Nový Zéland

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    3053-3061

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000450297600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85057529019