Consumer Credit other than for House Purchase Regulation in the Czech Republic and Selected EU Countries
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F20%3A50016859" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/20:50016859 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://digilib.uhk.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.12603/282/Soukal%20aj..pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y" target="_blank" >https://digilib.uhk.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.12603/282/Soukal%20aj..pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-081" target="_blank" >10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-081</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Consumer Credit other than for House Purchase Regulation in the Czech Republic and Selected EU Countries
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A transposition of 2014/17/EU changed consumer credit markets throughout the EU. In the Czech Republic the transposition by the act 257/2016 Coll. was taken as an opportunity to unify regulatory framework for all consumer credit regardless of a purchase purpose. At the same time this regulatory framework extension was motivated by adverse phenomena in a non-bank consumer credit sector such as predatory and usurious practices (regulatory arbitration, abuse of the social distress of debtors, credit cost obfuscation, pre-contract payments, insufficient or even none creditworthiness assessment and more). These issues were addressed by the market entry public regulation including employee’s professional qualification requirements. The paper compares professional qualification regulation approach in the Czech Republic and eleven selected EU countries. In the Czech Republic, Hungary, Greece was adopted the public regulation approach which combines national regulator supervisory with accredited institutions examination. On the other hand, in Germany and the Netherlands was an approach closer to a private regulation. Croatia and Portugal still did not completely transposed 2014/17/EU and are facing a legal procedure from the Court of Justice of the EU. In the Czech Republic a new regulation significantly decreased a number of non-bank consumer credit providers and their market share is diminishing since the last economic crisis. Yet, a new option of regulatory arbitrage for predatory creditors appeared although with a very limited impact on the market.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Consumer Credit other than for House Purchase Regulation in the Czech Republic and Selected EU Countries
Popis výsledku anglicky
A transposition of 2014/17/EU changed consumer credit markets throughout the EU. In the Czech Republic the transposition by the act 257/2016 Coll. was taken as an opportunity to unify regulatory framework for all consumer credit regardless of a purchase purpose. At the same time this regulatory framework extension was motivated by adverse phenomena in a non-bank consumer credit sector such as predatory and usurious practices (regulatory arbitration, abuse of the social distress of debtors, credit cost obfuscation, pre-contract payments, insufficient or even none creditworthiness assessment and more). These issues were addressed by the market entry public regulation including employee’s professional qualification requirements. The paper compares professional qualification regulation approach in the Czech Republic and eleven selected EU countries. In the Czech Republic, Hungary, Greece was adopted the public regulation approach which combines national regulator supervisory with accredited institutions examination. On the other hand, in Germany and the Netherlands was an approach closer to a private regulation. Croatia and Portugal still did not completely transposed 2014/17/EU and are facing a legal procedure from the Court of Justice of the EU. In the Czech Republic a new regulation significantly decreased a number of non-bank consumer credit providers and their market share is diminishing since the last economic crisis. Yet, a new option of regulatory arbitrage for predatory creditors appeared although with a very limited impact on the market.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50206 - Finance
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Hradec economic days 2020/1
ISBN
978-80-7435-776-3
ISSN
2464-6059
e-ISSN
2464-6067
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
712-720
Název nakladatele
University of Hradec Králové
Místo vydání
Hradec Králové
Místo konání akce
Hradec Králové
Datum konání akce
2. 4. 2020
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000568108700080