Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Consumer Behaviour in the Accommodation Services Market – a Comparison of Vienna, Bratislava and Prague in 2018

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F21%3A50018629" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/21:50018629 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/25619161:_____/21:N0000050

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/10003/9705" target="_blank" >https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/10003/9705</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.16" target="_blank" >10.18778/1508-2008.24.16</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Consumer Behaviour in the Accommodation Services Market – a Comparison of Vienna, Bratislava and Prague in 2018

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper aims to compare three accommodation services markets using empirical data from more than 250 accommodation facilities in specific destinations (Vienna, Bratislava, Prague). The data are available on a daily basis, but the resulting comparison is then performed on a monthly basis within 2018. The comparison is performed based on three basic criteria - occupancy, average daily rate and an indicator of price elasticity of demand. Price elasticity is measured using a log-log regression analysis. The key findings of the comparison are as follows: (1) The Vienna and Prague markets are similar in terms of occupancy and coefficient of price elasticity. In contrast, the Bratislava market showed statistically significant differences from the other two markets in all the criteria under review. (2) The Bratislava market operates at a significantly lower price range compared to the other markets analysed. In the long term, this market has also been lower in the field of occupancy. (3) The markets in Vienna and Prague respond more dynamically to changes in consumer behaviour by changing prices. (4) The so-called &quot;November Phenomenon&quot; has been identified, where all indicators in all markets behave unconventionally. (5) All markets have in common the fact that they have shown price-inelastic demand over the long term, and at the turn of the year, they all face Giffen&apos;s paradox.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Consumer Behaviour in the Accommodation Services Market – a Comparison of Vienna, Bratislava and Prague in 2018

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper aims to compare three accommodation services markets using empirical data from more than 250 accommodation facilities in specific destinations (Vienna, Bratislava, Prague). The data are available on a daily basis, but the resulting comparison is then performed on a monthly basis within 2018. The comparison is performed based on three basic criteria - occupancy, average daily rate and an indicator of price elasticity of demand. Price elasticity is measured using a log-log regression analysis. The key findings of the comparison are as follows: (1) The Vienna and Prague markets are similar in terms of occupancy and coefficient of price elasticity. In contrast, the Bratislava market showed statistically significant differences from the other two markets in all the criteria under review. (2) The Bratislava market operates at a significantly lower price range compared to the other markets analysed. In the long term, this market has also been lower in the field of occupancy. (3) The markets in Vienna and Prague respond more dynamically to changes in consumer behaviour by changing prices. (4) The so-called &quot;November Phenomenon&quot; has been identified, where all indicators in all markets behave unconventionally. (5) All markets have in common the fact that they have shown price-inelastic demand over the long term, and at the turn of the year, they all face Giffen&apos;s paradox.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Comparative Economic Research

  • ISSN

    1508-2008

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    24

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    PL - Polská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

    137-152

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000668580400008

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85120605385