Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F22%3A50019019" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/22:50019019 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.dovepress.com/critical-factors-and-economic-methods-for-regulatory-impact-assessment-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-RMHP" target="_blank" >https://www.dovepress.com/critical-factors-and-economic-methods-for-regulatory-impact-assessment-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-RMHP</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S346928" target="_blank" >10.2147/RMHP.S346928</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: The regulatory area is one that restricts human behaviour and opportunities, but it also allows the prevention of loss of property, health, or even life in various fields. Regulations provide the market with public confidence, which is extremely important in the field of innovative medical devices. The aim of this article is to analyse critical factors and economic methods for regulatory impact assessment in the medical device industry, to focus on the finances, processes, or innovation activity of organisations operating in the medical device sector. Methods: The paper consists of a scoping review according to the PRISMA methodology of the available literature in Web of Science and Scopus database, whereby combing the keywords “regulation” AND “innovation” AND “medical device” AND “economic impact,” we obtained a set of 156 results in the form of English-written articles. The output was then limited to the period between 2011 and 2020. Finally, 23 papers were used based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting challenges of the identified problems in particular are the amount of high-quality data available at an appropriate cost and the availability of a flexible notified body. There are also challenges specific to the situation, such as demands on the safety of medical devices for children. From a public expectations point of view, there is a continuing need to maintain the urgency of the balance between available innovation and safety. Discussion: As for the methods of economic assessment in general, or methods for assessing the economic impact of regulations in particular, cost-effectiveness analysis is the most commonly used method for research and development, while internal rate of return is frequently used for the producers, and budget impact analysis is typically used for healthcare service providers. A non-financial indicator that is often discussed is the time demands associated with meeting compliance requirements. The time-to-market indicator is also often mentioned. Economic and financial topics are not discussed in depth, as the reviewed articles simply mention the generally high costs attendant on complying with regulations and obtaining certificates. © 2022 Maci and Marešová.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: The regulatory area is one that restricts human behaviour and opportunities, but it also allows the prevention of loss of property, health, or even life in various fields. Regulations provide the market with public confidence, which is extremely important in the field of innovative medical devices. The aim of this article is to analyse critical factors and economic methods for regulatory impact assessment in the medical device industry, to focus on the finances, processes, or innovation activity of organisations operating in the medical device sector. Methods: The paper consists of a scoping review according to the PRISMA methodology of the available literature in Web of Science and Scopus database, whereby combing the keywords “regulation” AND “innovation” AND “medical device” AND “economic impact,” we obtained a set of 156 results in the form of English-written articles. The output was then limited to the period between 2011 and 2020. Finally, 23 papers were used based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting challenges of the identified problems in particular are the amount of high-quality data available at an appropriate cost and the availability of a flexible notified body. There are also challenges specific to the situation, such as demands on the safety of medical devices for children. From a public expectations point of view, there is a continuing need to maintain the urgency of the balance between available innovation and safety. Discussion: As for the methods of economic assessment in general, or methods for assessing the economic impact of regulations in particular, cost-effectiveness analysis is the most commonly used method for research and development, while internal rate of return is frequently used for the producers, and budget impact analysis is typically used for healthcare service providers. A non-financial indicator that is often discussed is the time demands associated with meeting compliance requirements. The time-to-market indicator is also often mentioned. Economic and financial topics are not discussed in depth, as the reviewed articles simply mention the generally high costs attendant on complying with regulations and obtaining certificates. © 2022 Maci and Marešová.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30312 - Substance abuse

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy

ISSN

1179-1594

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

January

Stát vydavatele periodika

NZ - Nový Zéland

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

71-91

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85123934002