The application of the legal principle of proportionality in the practice of social work

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F23%3A50019123" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/23:50019123 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800" target="_blank" >10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The application of the legal principle of proportionality in the practice of social work

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

One integral aspect of the ambivalent profession of social work is maintaining the balance between help and control. Especially in situations in which clients or those around them are endangered, control approaches become not only legitimate, but necessary. Within these measures, social workers have to deal with complex decision-making dilemmas within which different rights are often in conflict with each other. Judges who apply the principle of proportionality to resolve conflicts between rights find themselves in similar situations. Using the logical process of analogy, this article presents a proposal regarding how to work with the legal principle of proportionality in the practice of social work. Such a process can help to legitimise the selection of procedures, especially for social workers in countries where codes of ethics in relation to the exercise of control have not been developed. The proposal outlined here can also be used by other social workers in various environments to address the issue of how to deal with conflicts between human rights.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The application of the legal principle of proportionality in the practice of social work

Popis výsledku anglicky

One integral aspect of the ambivalent profession of social work is maintaining the balance between help and control. Especially in situations in which clients or those around them are endangered, control approaches become not only legitimate, but necessary. Within these measures, social workers have to deal with complex decision-making dilemmas within which different rights are often in conflict with each other. Judges who apply the principle of proportionality to resolve conflicts between rights find themselves in similar situations. Using the logical process of analogy, this article presents a proposal regarding how to work with the legal principle of proportionality in the practice of social work. Such a process can help to legitimise the selection of procedures, especially for social workers in countries where codes of ethics in relation to the exercise of control have not been developed. The proposal outlined here can also be used by other social workers in various environments to address the issue of how to deal with conflicts between human rights.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European journal of social work

ISSN

1369-1457

e-ISSN

1468-2664

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

589-600

Kód UT WoS článku

000784464800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85129650558