Event and Method
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F24%3A50022141" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/24:50022141 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0913115010.31577filozofia.2024.79.7.4.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0913115010.31577filozofia.2024.79.7.4.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.7.4" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.7.4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Event and Method
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article will pursue two goals. First, it compares Romano’s notion of the event with Merleau-Ponty’s notion of expression. They can be seen as fulfilling similar functions emphasizing the possibility of unexpected happenings. Both thematize the ability of the transformation that lies at the foundation of the very possibility of experience.Second, the article stresses the difference between these notions, which illustrates a certain methodological difference in Romano’s and Merleau-Ponty’s approaches. The former approach can be loosely described as transcendental, as it seeks to emphasize that events operate as a condition of possibility of experience and, as such, are not explainable by everyday experience. The latter approach relies on emphasizing the circular connection between our everyday experience and an unexpected possibility of reorganizing this experience: according to this strategy, unexpectedness should be seen as a reserve of everydayness, which always carries with itself a tacit possibility of transformation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Event and Method
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article will pursue two goals. First, it compares Romano’s notion of the event with Merleau-Ponty’s notion of expression. They can be seen as fulfilling similar functions emphasizing the possibility of unexpected happenings. Both thematize the ability of the transformation that lies at the foundation of the very possibility of experience.Second, the article stresses the difference between these notions, which illustrates a certain methodological difference in Romano’s and Merleau-Ponty’s approaches. The former approach can be loosely described as transcendental, as it seeks to emphasize that events operate as a condition of possibility of experience and, as such, are not explainable by everyday experience. The latter approach relies on emphasizing the circular connection between our everyday experience and an unexpected possibility of reorganizing this experience: according to this strategy, unexpectedness should be seen as a reserve of everydayness, which always carries with itself a tacit possibility of transformation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Filozofia
ISSN
0046-385X
e-ISSN
2585-7061
Svazek periodika
79
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
752-767
Kód UT WoS článku
001318847300004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85206159864