Arguing in their own way or adapting to the masculine world? An analysis of male and female argumentative styles in the Czech Chamber of Deputies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F25%3A50019905" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/25:50019905 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13572334.2022.2164818?src=getftr&utm_source=scopus&getft_integrator=scopus" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13572334.2022.2164818?src=getftr&utm_source=scopus&getft_integrator=scopus</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2022.2164818" target="_blank" >10.1080/13572334.2022.2164818</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Arguing in their own way or adapting to the masculine world? An analysis of male and female argumentative styles in the Czech Chamber of Deputies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article is focused on the differences in argumentation of male and female MPs and the impact of parliamentary experience and party ideology. Our pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentation encompasses 150 parliamentary speeches in the Czech Chamber of Deputies (2017–2019). The results show that gender does not influence the number of concrete arguments in the speeches, but women use slightly more abstract arguments. Speeches of senior female MPs have a larger number of both, abstract and concrete arguments. Moreover, senior male MPs use a greater number of concrete arguments but a smaller number of abstract arguments. Finally, leftist female MPs create more abstract arguments and fewer concrete arguments than rightist female MPs. The findings add to the discussion about political socialisation and accommodation of female MPs in male-dominated parliaments and extend the geopolitical scope of previous research.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Arguing in their own way or adapting to the masculine world? An analysis of male and female argumentative styles in the Czech Chamber of Deputies

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article is focused on the differences in argumentation of male and female MPs and the impact of parliamentary experience and party ideology. Our pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentation encompasses 150 parliamentary speeches in the Czech Chamber of Deputies (2017–2019). The results show that gender does not influence the number of concrete arguments in the speeches, but women use slightly more abstract arguments. Speeches of senior female MPs have a larger number of both, abstract and concrete arguments. Moreover, senior male MPs use a greater number of concrete arguments but a smaller number of abstract arguments. Finally, leftist female MPs create more abstract arguments and fewer concrete arguments than rightist female MPs. The findings add to the discussion about political socialisation and accommodation of female MPs in male-dominated parliaments and extend the geopolitical scope of previous research.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GJ20-12580Y" target="_blank" >GJ20-12580Y: Studium parlamentních projevů a jejich efektů na výsledky práce poslanců v České republice</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Journal of Legislative Studies

ISSN

1357-2334

e-ISSN

1743-9337

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

130-153

Kód UT WoS článku

000908467300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85146730528