Residual neuromuscular block in paediatric anaesthesia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F19%3A00070512" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/19:00070512 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109048
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091218307670?via%3Dihub#" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091218307670?via%3Dihub#</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.001" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.001</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Residual neuromuscular block in paediatric anaesthesia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: Residual neuromuscular blockade (RNB) in postoperative period is frequent (26-88%) and it is associated with negative impact on perioperative morbidity. The safety cut-off measured by accelerometry is currently defined as Train-of-four ratio (TOFr) >= 0.9. The primary outcome of the study was detect the incidence of RNB measured just prior extubation in the operating room (OR) (according to pragmatic trial design) and the secondary outcome was the incidence of the RNB in postanaethesia care unit (PACU). Methods: After Ethics Committee (10/2016) approval, paediatric patients (1.1.2017-31.12.2017) undergoing surgery in general anaesthesia with muscle relaxation were included in the study. The level of blockade was measured just prior to extubation in OR (patient eligible for extubation according to the anesthesiologist) and after arrival at PACU with acceleromtery - TOF-Watch(R)SX (Organon, Inc, West Orange, NJ). The mode for measurement was Train-of-four (TOF) and Train-of-four ratio (TOFr), in case of deep blockade Post-tetanic count (PTC). Data are described by descriptive analytic methods (mean, standard deviation -SD, median). Results: Overall, 291 patients were included in the study. The incidence of RNB in the OR was 48.2 % (95% CI: 42.4 54.1%, n=136) and the incidence of RNB in PACU was 26.9 % (95% CI: 19.5 35.3 %, n = 32). Active block reversal was administered in 23.3% (n=68) patients. Overall, 31.6% (87/275) patients were extubated with TOFr<0.9. Conclusion: Residual neuromuscular blockade in selected cohort of paediatric patients was frequent.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Residual neuromuscular block in paediatric anaesthesia
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: Residual neuromuscular blockade (RNB) in postoperative period is frequent (26-88%) and it is associated with negative impact on perioperative morbidity. The safety cut-off measured by accelerometry is currently defined as Train-of-four ratio (TOFr) >= 0.9. The primary outcome of the study was detect the incidence of RNB measured just prior extubation in the operating room (OR) (according to pragmatic trial design) and the secondary outcome was the incidence of the RNB in postanaethesia care unit (PACU). Methods: After Ethics Committee (10/2016) approval, paediatric patients (1.1.2017-31.12.2017) undergoing surgery in general anaesthesia with muscle relaxation were included in the study. The level of blockade was measured just prior to extubation in OR (patient eligible for extubation according to the anesthesiologist) and after arrival at PACU with acceleromtery - TOF-Watch(R)SX (Organon, Inc, West Orange, NJ). The mode for measurement was Train-of-four (TOF) and Train-of-four ratio (TOFr), in case of deep blockade Post-tetanic count (PTC). Data are described by descriptive analytic methods (mean, standard deviation -SD, median). Results: Overall, 291 patients were included in the study. The incidence of RNB in the OR was 48.2 % (95% CI: 42.4 54.1%, n=136) and the incidence of RNB in PACU was 26.9 % (95% CI: 19.5 35.3 %, n = 32). Active block reversal was administered in 23.3% (n=68) patients. Overall, 31.6% (87/275) patients were extubated with TOFr<0.9. Conclusion: Residual neuromuscular blockade in selected cohort of paediatric patients was frequent.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30223 - Anaesthesiology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
British Journal Of Anaesthesia
ISSN
0007-0912
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
122
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
2
Strana od-do
"E1"-"E2"
Kód UT WoS článku
000453927600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85058663537