Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F21%3A00074571" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/21:00074571 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122591

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2021/11000/Videolaryngoscopy_vs__Direct_Laryngoscopy_for.10.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2021/11000/Videolaryngoscopy_vs__Direct_Laryngoscopy_for.10.aspx</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001595" target="_blank" >10.1097/EJA.0000000000001595</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    BACKGROUND The indirect visualisation of the glottic area with a videolaryngoscope could improve intubation conditions which may possibly lead to a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. OBJECTIVE Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management in paediatric patients. DESIGN Prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTINGS Operating room. PARTICIPANTS 535 paediatric patients undergoing elective anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 501 patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated to the videolaryngoscopy group (n = 265) and to the direct laryngoscopy group (n = 269) for the primary airway management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The first attempt intubation success rate was assessed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were defined as: the time to successful intubation (time to the first EtCO2 wave), the overall intubation success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the incidence of complications, and the impact of the length of the operator&apos;s clinical practice. RESULTS The study was terminated after the planned interim analysis for futility. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group; 86.8% (n = 211) vs. 92.6% (n = 239), P = 0.046. The mean time to the first EtCO2 wave was longer in the videolaryngoscopy group at 39.0 s +/- 36.7 compared to the direct laryngoscopy group, 23.6 s +/- 24.7 (P &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in the overall intubation success rate, in the incidence of complications nor significant difference based on the length of the clinical practice of the operator. CONCLUSIONS The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group in comparison to the direct laryngoscopy group. The time needed for successful intubation with videolaryngoscopy was longer compared with direct laryngoscopy.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    BACKGROUND The indirect visualisation of the glottic area with a videolaryngoscope could improve intubation conditions which may possibly lead to a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. OBJECTIVE Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management in paediatric patients. DESIGN Prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTINGS Operating room. PARTICIPANTS 535 paediatric patients undergoing elective anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 501 patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated to the videolaryngoscopy group (n = 265) and to the direct laryngoscopy group (n = 269) for the primary airway management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The first attempt intubation success rate was assessed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were defined as: the time to successful intubation (time to the first EtCO2 wave), the overall intubation success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the incidence of complications, and the impact of the length of the operator&apos;s clinical practice. RESULTS The study was terminated after the planned interim analysis for futility. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group; 86.8% (n = 211) vs. 92.6% (n = 239), P = 0.046. The mean time to the first EtCO2 wave was longer in the videolaryngoscopy group at 39.0 s +/- 36.7 compared to the direct laryngoscopy group, 23.6 s +/- 24.7 (P &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in the overall intubation success rate, in the incidence of complications nor significant difference based on the length of the clinical practice of the operator. CONCLUSIONS The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group in comparison to the direct laryngoscopy group. The time needed for successful intubation with videolaryngoscopy was longer compared with direct laryngoscopy.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30209 - Paediatrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    European Journal of Anaesthesiology

  • ISSN

    0265-0215

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    38

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    11

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    1187-1193

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000703607400011

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus