Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F21%3A00074571" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/21:00074571 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122591
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2021/11000/Videolaryngoscopy_vs__Direct_Laryngoscopy_for.10.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Fulltext/2021/11000/Videolaryngoscopy_vs__Direct_Laryngoscopy_for.10.aspx</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001595" target="_blank" >10.1097/EJA.0000000000001595</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND The indirect visualisation of the glottic area with a videolaryngoscope could improve intubation conditions which may possibly lead to a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. OBJECTIVE Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management in paediatric patients. DESIGN Prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTINGS Operating room. PARTICIPANTS 535 paediatric patients undergoing elective anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 501 patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated to the videolaryngoscopy group (n = 265) and to the direct laryngoscopy group (n = 269) for the primary airway management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The first attempt intubation success rate was assessed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were defined as: the time to successful intubation (time to the first EtCO2 wave), the overall intubation success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the incidence of complications, and the impact of the length of the operator's clinical practice. RESULTS The study was terminated after the planned interim analysis for futility. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group; 86.8% (n = 211) vs. 92.6% (n = 239), P = 0.046. The mean time to the first EtCO2 wave was longer in the videolaryngoscopy group at 39.0 s +/- 36.7 compared to the direct laryngoscopy group, 23.6 s +/- 24.7 (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall intubation success rate, in the incidence of complications nor significant difference based on the length of the clinical practice of the operator. CONCLUSIONS The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group in comparison to the direct laryngoscopy group. The time needed for successful intubation with videolaryngoscopy was longer compared with direct laryngoscopy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia A prospective randomised controlled trial
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND The indirect visualisation of the glottic area with a videolaryngoscope could improve intubation conditions which may possibly lead to a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. OBJECTIVE Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management in paediatric patients. DESIGN Prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTINGS Operating room. PARTICIPANTS 535 paediatric patients undergoing elective anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 501 patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated to the videolaryngoscopy group (n = 265) and to the direct laryngoscopy group (n = 269) for the primary airway management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The first attempt intubation success rate was assessed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were defined as: the time to successful intubation (time to the first EtCO2 wave), the overall intubation success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the incidence of complications, and the impact of the length of the operator's clinical practice. RESULTS The study was terminated after the planned interim analysis for futility. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group; 86.8% (n = 211) vs. 92.6% (n = 239), P = 0.046. The mean time to the first EtCO2 wave was longer in the videolaryngoscopy group at 39.0 s +/- 36.7 compared to the direct laryngoscopy group, 23.6 s +/- 24.7 (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall intubation success rate, in the incidence of complications nor significant difference based on the length of the clinical practice of the operator. CONCLUSIONS The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group in comparison to the direct laryngoscopy group. The time needed for successful intubation with videolaryngoscopy was longer compared with direct laryngoscopy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30209 - Paediatrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
ISSN
0265-0215
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
38
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
11
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1187-1193
Kód UT WoS článku
000703607400011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—