Is it possible to measure CO2 effluxes in an arable ecosystem using chambers without soil frames?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F13%3A00424052" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/13:00424052 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Is it possible to measure CO2 effluxes in an arable ecosystem using chambers without soil frames?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The push-in chamber and chambers with alternative gaskets were tested under fi eld conditions in order to estimate the rates of under- or overestimation of the CO2 effl uxes measured with chambers placed directly on a soil surface (without collars). Th eexperiment was conducted on a spring barley fi eld which was harvested just before the measuring campaign. Th e following were tested: 1) a pushed-in chamber with a sharp metal blade installed on the edge of the chamber walls which was inserted to a depth of 1?2 cm to the soil, 2) a chamber with a 10 cm wide and 3 cm high rubber gasket, and 3) a chamber with a 10 cm wide and 2 cm high neoprene gasket. Th e results indicated that the application of the pushed-in chamber led to overestimation of the fl uxes by 55%, while application of chambers with alternative gaskets led to underestimation of the fl uxes by 30?40% due to the leakage of the gas from the chamber headspace through holes beneath the gaskets. Our experiment confi rmed that

Název v anglickém jazyce

Is it possible to measure CO2 effluxes in an arable ecosystem using chambers without soil frames?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The push-in chamber and chambers with alternative gaskets were tested under fi eld conditions in order to estimate the rates of under- or overestimation of the CO2 effl uxes measured with chambers placed directly on a soil surface (without collars). Th eexperiment was conducted on a spring barley fi eld which was harvested just before the measuring campaign. Th e following were tested: 1) a pushed-in chamber with a sharp metal blade installed on the edge of the chamber walls which was inserted to a depth of 1?2 cm to the soil, 2) a chamber with a 10 cm wide and 3 cm high rubber gasket, and 3) a chamber with a 10 cm wide and 2 cm high neoprene gasket. Th e results indicated that the application of the pushed-in chamber led to overestimation of the fl uxes by 55%, while application of chambers with alternative gaskets led to underestimation of the fl uxes by 30?40% due to the leakage of the gas from the chamber headspace through holes beneath the gaskets. Our experiment confi rmed that

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

EH - Ekologie – společenstva

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Global Change and Resilience: From Impacts to Responses : Proceedings of the 3rd annual Global Change and Resilience Conference

ISBN

978-80-904351-8-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

168-172

Název nakladatele

Global change research centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v. v. i

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Brno

Datum konání akce

22. 5. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—