Refraction tomography of the Bohemian Massif structures: a critical review and reply to the Comments of Hrubcová et al. (2013)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985530%3A_____%2F13%3A00395999" target="_blank" >RIV/67985530:_____/13:00395999 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9241-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9241-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9241-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10712-013-9241-3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Refraction tomography of the Bohemian Massif structures: a critical review and reply to the Comments of Hrubcová et al. (2013)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper presents a critical review of the tomography results concerning the Bohemian Massif territory. The discussed tomography studies are based on the data acquired in the international refraction experiments covering the Central Europe in 2000-2003and considerably vary as concerns the approaches and the numerical methods used. In particular, the pure tomographic methods, applied by Růžek in 2007 and Novotný in 2009-2012, do not introduced subjective features into the structural models establishedby the trial-and-error forward modeling. The interactive modeling, commonly used by the other authors, perhaps brings more fun at a modeler's work but it can hardly comprise more than several tens of model parameters. Necessarily subjective selection ofthe modeled features denies the objectivity of resulting models. Therefore, the pure tomographic approaches, uniformly restoring all model parameters are better candidates to obtain a velocity image closer to medium. Common predictors for
Název v anglickém jazyce
Refraction tomography of the Bohemian Massif structures: a critical review and reply to the Comments of Hrubcová et al. (2013)
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper presents a critical review of the tomography results concerning the Bohemian Massif territory. The discussed tomography studies are based on the data acquired in the international refraction experiments covering the Central Europe in 2000-2003and considerably vary as concerns the approaches and the numerical methods used. In particular, the pure tomographic methods, applied by Růžek in 2007 and Novotný in 2009-2012, do not introduced subjective features into the structural models establishedby the trial-and-error forward modeling. The interactive modeling, commonly used by the other authors, perhaps brings more fun at a modeler's work but it can hardly comprise more than several tens of model parameters. Necessarily subjective selection ofthe modeled features denies the objectivity of resulting models. Therefore, the pure tomographic approaches, uniformly restoring all model parameters are better candidates to obtain a velocity image closer to medium. Common predictors for
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
DC - Seismologie, vulkanologie a struktura Země
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Surveys in Geophysics
ISSN
0169-3298
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
34
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
531-540
Kód UT WoS článku
000321547400008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—