A Comparison of Plausibility Conflict and of Degree of Conflict Based on Amount of Uncertainty of Belief Functions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F15%3A00447886" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/15:00447886 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_40" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_40</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_40" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_40</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Comparison of Plausibility Conflict and of Degree of Conflict Based on Amount of Uncertainty of Belief Functions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

When combining belief functions by conjunctive rules of combination, conflicts often appear. Combination of conflicting belief functions and interpretation of conflicts is often questionable in real applications, thus a series of alternative combinationrules was suggested and a series of papers on conflicting belief functions published in last years. This theoretical contribution presents one of the perspective recent approaches - author?s plausibility conflict - and Harmanec?s approach which stands, unfortunately, aside the recent interest: conflict based on uncertainty measure and Dempster?s rule. Both the approaches are analysed and compared here. The compared approaches are based on completely different assumptions, thus some of their properties are very different almost counterintuitive when first look at; on the other hand, they have some analogous properties, which distinguish them from other commonly used approaches to conflict between belief functions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Comparison of Plausibility Conflict and of Degree of Conflict Based on Amount of Uncertainty of Belief Functions

Popis výsledku anglicky

When combining belief functions by conjunctive rules of combination, conflicts often appear. Combination of conflicting belief functions and interpretation of conflicts is often questionable in real applications, thus a series of alternative combinationrules was suggested and a series of papers on conflicting belief functions published in last years. This theoretical contribution presents one of the perspective recent approaches - author?s plausibility conflict - and Harmanec?s approach which stands, unfortunately, aside the recent interest: conflict based on uncertainty measure and Dempster?s rule. Both the approaches are analysed and compared here. The compared approaches are based on completely different assumptions, thus some of their properties are very different almost counterintuitive when first look at; on the other hand, they have some analogous properties, which distinguish them from other commonly used approaches to conflict between belief functions.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

BA - Obecná matematika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

ECSQARU 2015. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

ISBN

978-3-319-20806-0

ISSN

0302-9743

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

440-450

Název nakladatele

Springer

Místo vydání

Cham

Místo konání akce

Compiegne

Datum konání akce

15. 7. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000364847800040