Magnetic field in the Earth's magnetosheath: Models versus observations

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985815%3A_____%2F24%3A00598896" target="_blank" >RIV/67985815:_____/24:00598896 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032393" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032393</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032393" target="_blank" >10.1029/2023JA032393</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Magnetic field in the Earth's magnetosheath: Models versus observations

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Magnetic field measurements in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778), Romashets and Vandas (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006), Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), and Romashets et al. (2010), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010). The bow shock and the magnetopause are modeled as paraboloids in all models except that of Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), in which they are assumed to be spheroids. 34 magnetosheath crossings by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and it is concluded that the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best.nKey Points: Magnetic field observations in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, Performance of the models was ranked using 34 magnetosheath passages, he model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best

Název v anglickém jazyce

Magnetic field in the Earth's magnetosheath: Models versus observations

Popis výsledku anglicky

Magnetic field measurements in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778), Romashets and Vandas (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006), Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), and Romashets et al. (2010), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010). The bow shock and the magnetopause are modeled as paraboloids in all models except that of Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), in which they are assumed to be spheroids. 34 magnetosheath crossings by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and it is concluded that the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best.nKey Points: Magnetic field observations in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, Performance of the models was ranked using 34 magnetosheath passages, he model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10308 - Astronomy (including astrophysics,space science)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA21-26463S" target="_blank" >GA21-26463S: Procesy na magnetopauze, jejich příčiny a následky</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Geophysical Research-Space Physics

ISSN

2169-9380

e-ISSN

2169-9402

Svazek periodika

129

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

e2023JA032393

Kód UT WoS článku

001320345400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85205325525