Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985831%3A_____%2F12%3A00388162" target="_blank" >RIV/67985831:_____/12:00388162 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11310/12:10209852

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529" target="_blank" >10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Screen-washing of matrix from 37 Upper Cretaceous microvertebrate localities in southern Utah, USA, yielded a rich sample of anuran disarticulated bones, including nearly 200 ilia. Because the bones are relatively small and delicate and were subject to pre-mortem transport and unavoidable damage when the fossiliferous matrix was collected and processed, none of the recovered ilia retained intact shafts. This means that features such as the form of the anterior end of the shaft and the presence and formof a dorsal crest cannot be used to identify the fossils. Urodele bones also are known from many of the same localities. When anuran and urodele ilia are isolated and missing much of their shafts, they are superficially similar, so it was important to reliably differentiate ilia of the two groups. Here we provide a list and brief descriptions of some of the features that we found useful for distinguishing between anuran and urodele ilia. These features relate to differences between the t

Název v anglickém jazyce

Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles

Popis výsledku anglicky

Screen-washing of matrix from 37 Upper Cretaceous microvertebrate localities in southern Utah, USA, yielded a rich sample of anuran disarticulated bones, including nearly 200 ilia. Because the bones are relatively small and delicate and were subject to pre-mortem transport and unavoidable damage when the fossiliferous matrix was collected and processed, none of the recovered ilia retained intact shafts. This means that features such as the form of the anterior end of the shaft and the presence and formof a dorsal crest cannot be used to identify the fossils. Urodele bones also are known from many of the same localities. When anuran and urodele ilia are isolated and missing much of their shafts, they are superficially similar, so it was important to reliably differentiate ilia of the two groups. Here we provide a list and brief descriptions of some of the features that we found useful for distinguishing between anuran and urodele ilia. These features relate to differences between the t

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DB - Geologie a mineralogie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ME08066" target="_blank" >ME08066: Evoluce společenstev žab během křídy v západní části Severní Ameriky; porovnání s fosilním záznamem z Eurasie</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France

ISSN

0037-9409

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

183

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

FR - Francouzská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

529-535

Kód UT WoS článku

000316156200006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—