Universal proof theory: Feasible admissibility in intuitionistic modal logics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985840%3A_____%2F25%3A00600572" target="_blank" >RIV/67985840:_____/25:00600572 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985807:_____/25:00600572
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2024.103526" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2024.103526</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2024.103526" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.apal.2024.103526</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Universal proof theory: Feasible admissibility in intuitionistic modal logics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We introduce a general and syntactically defined family of sequent-style calculi over the propositional language with the modalities {□,◇} and its fragments as a formalization for constructively acceptable systems. Calling these calculi constructive, we show that any strong enough constructive sequent calculus, satisfying a mild technical condition, feasibly admits all Visser's rules. This means that there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a proof of the premise of a Visser's rule, provides a proof for its conclusion. As a positive application, we establish the feasible admissibility of Visser's rules in sequent calculi for several intuitionistic modal logics, including CK, IK, their extensions by the modal axioms T, B, 4, 5, and the axioms for bounded width and depth and their fragments CK□, propositional lax logic and IPC. On the negative side, we show that if a strong enough intuitionistic modal logic (satisfying a mild technical condition) does not admit at least one of Visser's rules, it cannot have a constructive sequent calculus. Consequently, no intermediate logic other than IPC has a constructive sequent calculus.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Universal proof theory: Feasible admissibility in intuitionistic modal logics
Popis výsledku anglicky
We introduce a general and syntactically defined family of sequent-style calculi over the propositional language with the modalities {□,◇} and its fragments as a formalization for constructively acceptable systems. Calling these calculi constructive, we show that any strong enough constructive sequent calculus, satisfying a mild technical condition, feasibly admits all Visser's rules. This means that there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a proof of the premise of a Visser's rule, provides a proof for its conclusion. As a positive application, we establish the feasible admissibility of Visser's rules in sequent calculi for several intuitionistic modal logics, including CK, IK, their extensions by the modal axioms T, B, 4, 5, and the axioms for bounded width and depth and their fragments CK□, propositional lax logic and IPC. On the negative side, we show that if a strong enough intuitionistic modal logic (satisfying a mild technical condition) does not admit at least one of Visser's rules, it cannot have a constructive sequent calculus. Consequently, no intermediate logic other than IPC has a constructive sequent calculus.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10101 - Pure mathematics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
ISSN
0168-0072
e-ISSN
1873-2461
Svazek periodika
176
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
40
Strana od-do
103526
Kód UT WoS článku
001349603400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85207773176