Categories of settlement discard
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985912%3A_____%2F15%3A00448334" target="_blank" >RIV/67985912:_____/15:00448334 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Categories of settlement discard
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In 1972, M. B. Schiffer defined elementary categories of the archaeological record from the point of view of past human behaviour and the processes of archaeological context formation. These included the categories of primary and secondary refuse. Quitesoon, however, it became clear that these categories do not apply to most prehistoric and Early Medieval settlement contexts in Central Europe. These contexts usually consist of just the lower parts of settlement pits without any traces of the original activity surfaces (hence, primary refuse can hardly be expected) and with rare instances of deliberate dumping (secondary refuse). In this paper, the concepts of "tertiary refuse" and "internal and external residue" are introduced as categories explainingthe manner in which these settlement assemblages could have been formed. These concepts are presented here within a theoretical framework inspired by Evžen Neustupný, with particular attention being paid to the concepts of "structure" an
Název v anglickém jazyce
Categories of settlement discard
Popis výsledku anglicky
In 1972, M. B. Schiffer defined elementary categories of the archaeological record from the point of view of past human behaviour and the processes of archaeological context formation. These included the categories of primary and secondary refuse. Quitesoon, however, it became clear that these categories do not apply to most prehistoric and Early Medieval settlement contexts in Central Europe. These contexts usually consist of just the lower parts of settlement pits without any traces of the original activity surfaces (hence, primary refuse can hardly be expected) and with rare instances of deliberate dumping (secondary refuse). In this paper, the concepts of "tertiary refuse" and "internal and external residue" are introduced as categories explainingthe manner in which these settlement assemblages could have been formed. These concepts are presented here within a theoretical framework inspired by Evžen Neustupný, with particular attention being paid to the concepts of "structure" an
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GAP405%2F10%2F2289" target="_blank" >GAP405/10/2289: Záhada raně středověké sídelní aglomerace v Roztokách. Krajina, ekonomika a vzorce sídlištního chování</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Paradigm found. Archaeological theory - present, past and future
ISBN
978-1-78297-770-4
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
278-292
Počet stran knihy
292
Název nakladatele
Oxbow Books
Místo vydání
Oxford
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—