Book reviews in the history of knowledge

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985921%3A_____%2F21%3A00547986" target="_blank" >RIV/67985921:_____/21:00547986 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049" target="_blank" >10.4467/2543702XSHS.21.018.14049</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Book reviews in the history of knowledge

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Academic reviewing, one of the communal academic practices, is a vital genre, in which epistemic virtues have been cultivated. In our article, we discuss reviews as a form of institutionalized critique, which historians could use to trace the changing epistemic virtues within humanities. We propose to use them analogously to Lorraine Daston’s and Peter Galison’s treatment of atlases in their seminal work Objectivity as a marker of changing epistemic virtues in natural sciences and medicine. Based on Aristotle’s virtue theory and its neo-Aristotelian interpretation in the second half of the 20th century, as well as on its most recent applications in the field of history and philosophy of science, we propose a general conceptual framework for analyzing reviews in their historical dimension. Besides, we contend that the analysis of reviews should be carried out taking into account their historical context of social, political, cultural and media-environment. Otherwise, one may risks presupposing the existence of an autonomous, disconnected community of scholars.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Book reviews in the history of knowledge

Popis výsledku anglicky

Academic reviewing, one of the communal academic practices, is a vital genre, in which epistemic virtues have been cultivated. In our article, we discuss reviews as a form of institutionalized critique, which historians could use to trace the changing epistemic virtues within humanities. We propose to use them analogously to Lorraine Daston’s and Peter Galison’s treatment of atlases in their seminal work Objectivity as a marker of changing epistemic virtues in natural sciences and medicine. Based on Aristotle’s virtue theory and its neo-Aristotelian interpretation in the second half of the 20th century, as well as on its most recent applications in the field of history and philosophy of science, we propose a general conceptual framework for analyzing reviews in their historical dimension. Besides, we contend that the analysis of reviews should be carried out taking into account their historical context of social, political, cultural and media-environment. Otherwise, one may risks presupposing the existence of an autonomous, disconnected community of scholars.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia historiae scientiarum

ISSN

2451-3202

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

[-]

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

629-650

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85119381364