Historical Epistemology of Central, East and Southeast European Studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985921%3A_____%2F23%3A00577670" target="_blank" >RIV/67985921:_____/23:00577670 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://imagesofscience.wordpress.com/historical-epistemology-of-cesee-studies/" target="_blank" >https://imagesofscience.wordpress.com/historical-epistemology-of-cesee-studies/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Historical Epistemology of Central, East and Southeast European Studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

East European Studies is in an epistemological crisis. The Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine forces us to question analytical models and their epistemic premises that defined East European Studies in recent decades. Currently, a possible way out of the epistemological – and not only structural – crisis is often seen in the call for “decolonization,” “decentering,” and “provincialization” of Russia’s epistemic dominance in East European Studies, understood in its narrow sense as “Russian and Eurasian Studies.” We believe that the current crisis calls for more fundamental considerations. We want to examine the epistemic conditions of the methods and theories that have been applied within the framework of CESEE Studies over the last three decades. “Decolonizing” CESEE Studies not only means reforming curricula and syllabi, challenging established canons, or shifting the focus to “peripheral” areas of research. It means, first and foremost, doing political and historical epistemology, that is, reflecting on the epistemic, institutional, and political conditions of the emergence and development of theories, methods, and practices in CESEE Studies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Historical Epistemology of Central, East and Southeast European Studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

East European Studies is in an epistemological crisis. The Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine forces us to question analytical models and their epistemic premises that defined East European Studies in recent decades. Currently, a possible way out of the epistemological – and not only structural – crisis is often seen in the call for “decolonization,” “decentering,” and “provincialization” of Russia’s epistemic dominance in East European Studies, understood in its narrow sense as “Russian and Eurasian Studies.” We believe that the current crisis calls for more fundamental considerations. We want to examine the epistemic conditions of the methods and theories that have been applied within the framework of CESEE Studies over the last three decades. “Decolonizing” CESEE Studies not only means reforming curricula and syllabi, challenging established canons, or shifting the focus to “peripheral” areas of research. It means, first and foremost, doing political and historical epistemology, that is, reflecting on the epistemic, institutional, and political conditions of the emergence and development of theories, methods, and practices in CESEE Studies.

Druh

M - Uspořádání konference

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

Munich

Stát konání akce

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

16

Počet zahraničních účastníků

13

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

WRD - Celosvětová akce