Czechoslovak praxeology – a discipline thad did not exist?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985921%3A_____%2F25%3A00585207" target="_blank" >RIV/67985921:_____/25:00585207 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09638-1" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09638-1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09638-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11212-024-09638-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Czechoslovak praxeology – a discipline thad did not exist?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

On the basis of contemporary Czech and Slovak texts and correspondence between Czechoslovak scientists and Polish praxeologists, the study shows how praxeology, a scientific discipline that deals with human action and is primarily associated with the Polish environment and the prominent philosopher Tadeusz Kotarbiński (1886–1981), was viewed in Czechoslovakia in the 1960s and 1970s. The analysis also defines the factors that shaped the newly emerging “Czechoslovak” praxeology. One such factor was Polish-Czechoslovak (or rather Czech-Polish and Slovak-Polish) scientific relations, especially contacts with the Institute of Praxeology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. The article argues that a specific “national” form of Czechoslovak praxeology crystallised in Czechoslovakia around the turn of the 1970s. Although it was based on the Polish model, the habitus of certain Czechoslovak scholars to draw on works of Marxism-Leninism, the involvement of communist ideologues in the debate about the form and future of praxeology, and the historical context of the emerging normalisation after 1968 made Czechoslovak praxeology a peculiar mix of original Polish ideas and Czechoslovak scientific practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Czechoslovak praxeology – a discipline thad did not exist?

Popis výsledku anglicky

On the basis of contemporary Czech and Slovak texts and correspondence between Czechoslovak scientists and Polish praxeologists, the study shows how praxeology, a scientific discipline that deals with human action and is primarily associated with the Polish environment and the prominent philosopher Tadeusz Kotarbiński (1886–1981), was viewed in Czechoslovakia in the 1960s and 1970s. The analysis also defines the factors that shaped the newly emerging “Czechoslovak” praxeology. One such factor was Polish-Czechoslovak (or rather Czech-Polish and Slovak-Polish) scientific relations, especially contacts with the Institute of Praxeology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. The article argues that a specific “national” form of Czechoslovak praxeology crystallised in Czechoslovakia around the turn of the 1970s. Although it was based on the Polish model, the habitus of certain Czechoslovak scholars to draw on works of Marxism-Leninism, the involvement of communist ideologues in the debate about the form and future of praxeology, and the historical context of the emerging normalisation after 1968 made Czechoslovak praxeology a peculiar mix of original Polish ideas and Czechoslovak scientific practice.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GF21-45624L" target="_blank" >GF21-45624L: Československo-polské vědecké sítě v čase Studené války mezi velkou politikou a individuálními strategiemi</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studies in East European Thought

ISSN

0925-9392

e-ISSN

1573-0948

Svazek periodika

77

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

391-409

Kód UT WoS článku

001227531000002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105001077653