Ecophysiological traits of terrestrial and aquatic carnivorous plants: are the costs and benefits the same?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F11%3A00369568" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/11:00369568 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19604.x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19604.x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19604.x" target="_blank" >10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19604.x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ecophysiological traits of terrestrial and aquatic carnivorous plants: are the costs and benefits the same?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Central to the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory is the relationship between nutrients and photosynthesis: how efficiently carnivorous plants obtain scarce nutrients that are supplied primarily in form as prey, digest and mineralize them so that they can be readily used, and allocate them to immediate vs. future needs. Most carnivorous plants are terrestrial ? they are rooted in sandy or peaty wetland soils ? and most studies of cost-benefit trade-offs in carnivorous plants arebased on terrestrial carnivorous plants. However about 10% of carnivorous plants are unrooted aquatic plants. We ask whether the cost-benefit model applies equally well to aquatic carnivorous plants and what general insights into trade-off models are gained by this comparison. Nutrient limitation is more pronounced in terrestrial carnivorous plants, which also have much lower growth rates and much higher ratio of dark respiration to photosynthetic rates than aquatic plants.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ecophysiological traits of terrestrial and aquatic carnivorous plants: are the costs and benefits the same?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Central to the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory is the relationship between nutrients and photosynthesis: how efficiently carnivorous plants obtain scarce nutrients that are supplied primarily in form as prey, digest and mineralize them so that they can be readily used, and allocate them to immediate vs. future needs. Most carnivorous plants are terrestrial ? they are rooted in sandy or peaty wetland soils ? and most studies of cost-benefit trade-offs in carnivorous plants arebased on terrestrial carnivorous plants. However about 10% of carnivorous plants are unrooted aquatic plants. We ask whether the cost-benefit model applies equally well to aquatic carnivorous plants and what general insights into trade-off models are gained by this comparison. Nutrient limitation is more pronounced in terrestrial carnivorous plants, which also have much lower growth rates and much higher ratio of dark respiration to photosynthetic rates than aquatic plants.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EF - Botanika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Oikos

ISSN

0030-1299

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

120

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

DK - Dánské království

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

1721-1731

Kód UT WoS článku

000297051100014

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—