Prehistoric human impact in the mountains of Bohemia. Do pollen and archaeological data support the traditional scenario of a prehistoric "wilderness"?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F15%3A00447596" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/15:00447596 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985912:_____/15:00447596 RIV/00216208:11620/15:10313976
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.04.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.04.008</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.04.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.04.008</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Prehistoric human impact in the mountains of Bohemia. Do pollen and archaeological data support the traditional scenario of a prehistoric "wilderness"?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In the Czech Republic at least five landscape zones, differing by settlement history, can be distinguished. The main focus of this study are marginal mountainous zones: foothills, where the cultural landscape fully developed during high medieval colonization in the 13th century, and the central mountains were colonized mostly in the 16th century and later. Before colonization, these areas are thought to have been essentially wild; however, they are much less archaeologically known than the lowlands. Thestudy focuses on the tracing of a fine-scale prehistoric human impact in two pollen diagrams from the Lusatian Mountains (foothills) and the Bohemian Forest (central mountains). The pollen records are compared with available archaeological data. A casestudy comparing the off-site and on-site pollen records from the Vladař hillfort (Hallstatt) is presented to demonstrate the local signal of the pollen profiles of small mires. In both studied mountainous regions, the strongest prehistori
Název v anglickém jazyce
Prehistoric human impact in the mountains of Bohemia. Do pollen and archaeological data support the traditional scenario of a prehistoric "wilderness"?
Popis výsledku anglicky
In the Czech Republic at least five landscape zones, differing by settlement history, can be distinguished. The main focus of this study are marginal mountainous zones: foothills, where the cultural landscape fully developed during high medieval colonization in the 13th century, and the central mountains were colonized mostly in the 16th century and later. Before colonization, these areas are thought to have been essentially wild; however, they are much less archaeologically known than the lowlands. Thestudy focuses on the tracing of a fine-scale prehistoric human impact in two pollen diagrams from the Lusatian Mountains (foothills) and the Bohemian Forest (central mountains). The pollen records are compared with available archaeological data. A casestudy comparing the off-site and on-site pollen records from the Vladař hillfort (Hallstatt) is presented to demonstrate the local signal of the pollen profiles of small mires. In both studied mountainous regions, the strongest prehistori
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
EF - Botanika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
ISSN
0034-6667
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
220
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
September
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
29-43
Kód UT WoS článku
000357438800003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84929171120