Synthetic polyploids in Vicia cracca: methodology, effects on plant performance and aneuploidy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F17%3A00480325" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/17:00480325 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11310/17:10371560
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1414-y" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1414-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1414-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00606-017-1414-y</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Synthetic polyploids in Vicia cracca: methodology, effects on plant performance and aneuploidy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The creation of synthetic polyploids was possible even though it was met with relatively low success. Stomata length was affected directly by polyploidization. In contrast, plant size was neither a function of polyploidization nor of subsequent evolution. Time to germination increased in synthetic polyploids, suggesting that only subsequent evolution will return the germination rate to the original levels. While the relative genome size of synthetic polyploids fell within the range of natural polyploids, 25% of the synthetic polyploids turned out to be aneuploids. The differences in chromosome number were reflected in performance of the synthetic polyploids. Exclusion of aneuploids from the data, however, did not affect the between-cytotype comparison. A more detailed comparison of the frequency of aneuploids among natural and synthetic polyploids is needed to understand possible differences between synthetic and natural polyploids and the effects of aneuploidy on the conclusions of ecological studies comparing natural and synthetic polyploids.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Synthetic polyploids in Vicia cracca: methodology, effects on plant performance and aneuploidy
Popis výsledku anglicky
The creation of synthetic polyploids was possible even though it was met with relatively low success. Stomata length was affected directly by polyploidization. In contrast, plant size was neither a function of polyploidization nor of subsequent evolution. Time to germination increased in synthetic polyploids, suggesting that only subsequent evolution will return the germination rate to the original levels. While the relative genome size of synthetic polyploids fell within the range of natural polyploids, 25% of the synthetic polyploids turned out to be aneuploids. The differences in chromosome number were reflected in performance of the synthetic polyploids. Exclusion of aneuploids from the data, however, did not affect the between-cytotype comparison. A more detailed comparison of the frequency of aneuploids among natural and synthetic polyploids is needed to understand possible differences between synthetic and natural polyploids and the effects of aneuploidy on the conclusions of ecological studies comparing natural and synthetic polyploids.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10611 - Plant sciences, botany
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA13-32048S" target="_blank" >GA13-32048S: Důsledky polyploidizace: od jednotlivých znaků k populační dynamice</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Plant Systematics and Evolution
ISSN
0378-2697
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
303
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
AT - Rakouská republika
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
827-839
Kód UT WoS článku
000405829200002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85017252997