Comparing experimental and field-measured traits and their variability in Central European grassland species

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F20%3A00533084" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/20:00533084 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12875" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12875</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12875" target="_blank" >10.1111/jvs.12875</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparing experimental and field-measured traits and their variability in Central European grassland species

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Most variation in the experiment-measured trait data was explained by interspecific differences, except for leaf greenness (where species explained less than 50% of the variance), and the treatments had little effect on close associations of trait means. Species rankings based on SLA and LDMC, but not plant height, were stable across garden and field measurements. Though garden and field-measured ITV were positively associated with each other, the associations were not significant. Our study indicates that species can be stably ranked based on SLA and LDMC means across different datasets (experimental and field-based). To what extent species vary in their functional traits under field conditions can be, however, less well predicted from experimentally measured ITV. Garden-measured differences in ITV should be thus used with caution when associated with species' performance and distribution patterns explored in the field.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparing experimental and field-measured traits and their variability in Central European grassland species

Popis výsledku anglicky

Most variation in the experiment-measured trait data was explained by interspecific differences, except for leaf greenness (where species explained less than 50% of the variance), and the treatments had little effect on close associations of trait means. Species rankings based on SLA and LDMC, but not plant height, were stable across garden and field measurements. Though garden and field-measured ITV were positively associated with each other, the associations were not significant. Our study indicates that species can be stably ranked based on SLA and LDMC means across different datasets (experimental and field-based). To what extent species vary in their functional traits under field conditions can be, however, less well predicted from experimentally measured ITV. Garden-measured differences in ITV should be thus used with caution when associated with species' performance and distribution patterns explored in the field.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-09119S" target="_blank" >GA15-09119S: Determinanty lokální hojnosti rostlin: relativní význam rozdílů ve fitness a stabilizujících procesech</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Vegetation Science

ISSN

1100-9233

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

561-570

Kód UT WoS článku

000525964000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85083346814