Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The social dimensions of biological invasions in South Africa

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F20%3A00539224" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/20:00539224 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32394-3_24" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32394-3_24</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32394-3_24" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-32394-3_24</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The social dimensions of biological invasions in South Africa

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This chapter examines current knowledge relating to the human and social dimensions of biological invasions in South Africa. We do so by advancing 12 propositions and examining the evidence for or against each using South African literature. The propositions cover four broad issues: how people cause invasions, how they conceptualise them, effects of invasive species on people, and peoples’ responses to them. The propositions we assess include: (1) intentional introductions were and continue to reflect the social ethos of the time, (2) people go to great lengths to ensure that newly introduced species establish themselves, (3) human-mediated modifications help invasive species to establish, (4) howpeople think about and study invasive species is strongly shaped by social-ecological contexts, (5) knowledge and awareness of invasive species is low amongst the general public, (6) personal values are the primary factor affecting perceptions of invasive alien species and their control, (7) specific social-ecological contexts mediate how invasive species affect people, (8) research on social effects of invasive species primarily focuses on negative impacts, (9) the negative social impacts of invasive species on local livelihoods are of more concern to people than impacts on biodiversity, (10) people are less willing tomanage species regarded as ‘charismatic’, (11) social heterogeneity increases conflicts around the management of biological invasions, and (12) engagement with society is key to successful management. By advancing and questioning propositions, we were able to determine what is known, provide evidence for where gaps lie, and thus identify areas for future research.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The social dimensions of biological invasions in South Africa

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This chapter examines current knowledge relating to the human and social dimensions of biological invasions in South Africa. We do so by advancing 12 propositions and examining the evidence for or against each using South African literature. The propositions cover four broad issues: how people cause invasions, how they conceptualise them, effects of invasive species on people, and peoples’ responses to them. The propositions we assess include: (1) intentional introductions were and continue to reflect the social ethos of the time, (2) people go to great lengths to ensure that newly introduced species establish themselves, (3) human-mediated modifications help invasive species to establish, (4) howpeople think about and study invasive species is strongly shaped by social-ecological contexts, (5) knowledge and awareness of invasive species is low amongst the general public, (6) personal values are the primary factor affecting perceptions of invasive alien species and their control, (7) specific social-ecological contexts mediate how invasive species affect people, (8) research on social effects of invasive species primarily focuses on negative impacts, (9) the negative social impacts of invasive species on local livelihoods are of more concern to people than impacts on biodiversity, (10) people are less willing tomanage species regarded as ‘charismatic’, (11) social heterogeneity increases conflicts around the management of biological invasions, and (12) engagement with society is key to successful management. By advancing and questioning propositions, we were able to determine what is known, provide evidence for where gaps lie, and thus identify areas for future research.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10618 - Ecology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GX19-28807X" target="_blank" >GX19-28807X: Makroekologie rostlinných invazí: význam stanovišť a globální syntéza (SynHab)</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Biological Invasions in South Africa

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-32393-6

  • Počet stran výsledku

    29

  • Strana od-do

    701-729

  • Počet stran knihy

    975

  • Název nakladatele

    Springer

  • Místo vydání

    Cham

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly