The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F22%3A00562842" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/22:00562842 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11310/22:10453962

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis predicts successful alien invaders to be distantly related to native species, whereas his preadaptation hypothesis predicts the opposite. It has been suggested that depending on the invasion stage (that is, introduction,naturalization and invasiveness), both hypotheses, now known as Darwin’s naturalization conundrum, could hold true. We tested this by analysing whether the likelihood of introduction for cultivation, as well as the subsequent stages of naturalizationand spread (that is, becoming invasive) of species alien to Southern Africa are correlated with their phylogenetic distance to the native flora of this region. Although species are more likely to be introduced for cultivation if they are distantly related to the native flora, the probability of subsequent naturalization was higher for species closely related to the native flora. Furthermore,the probability of becoming invasive was higher for naturalized species distantly related to the native flora. These results were consistent across three different metrics of phylogenetic distance. Our study reveals that the relationship between phylogenetic distance to the native flora and the success of an alien species changes from one invasion stage to the other.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion

Popis výsledku anglicky

Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis predicts successful alien invaders to be distantly related to native species, whereas his preadaptation hypothesis predicts the opposite. It has been suggested that depending on the invasion stage (that is, introduction,naturalization and invasiveness), both hypotheses, now known as Darwin’s naturalization conundrum, could hold true. We tested this by analysing whether the likelihood of introduction for cultivation, as well as the subsequent stages of naturalizationand spread (that is, becoming invasive) of species alien to Southern Africa are correlated with their phylogenetic distance to the native flora of this region. Although species are more likely to be introduced for cultivation if they are distantly related to the native flora, the probability of subsequent naturalization was higher for species closely related to the native flora. Furthermore,the probability of becoming invasive was higher for naturalized species distantly related to the native flora. These results were consistent across three different metrics of phylogenetic distance. Our study reveals that the relationship between phylogenetic distance to the native flora and the success of an alien species changes from one invasion stage to the other.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX19-28807X" target="_blank" >GX19-28807X: Makroekologie rostlinných invazí: význam stanovišť a globální syntéza (SynHab)</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Nature Plants

ISSN

2055-026X

e-ISSN

2055-0278

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

906-914

Kód UT WoS článku

000839555600004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85136110522