Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Trash or treasure: Rhizome conservation during drought

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F23%3A00575771" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/23:00575771 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11310/23:10475505

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14385" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14385</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14385" target="_blank" >10.1111/1365-2435.14385</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Trash or treasure: Rhizome conservation during drought

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The role of storage carbohydrates in plant carbon economy is currently disputed as possibly passive accumulation when other resources are limiting growth, or part of a conservative growth strategy as insurance for regrowth and stress response. One indication may be the fate of carbohydrates in senescing rhizomes, as either translocated to be retained in the live and growing end of the rhizome or kept within the senescing rhizome end and lost into the soil for it to decompose.To examine carbohydrate storage in senescing rhizomes, eight rhizomatous species were grown in a split-pot design with one compartment containing the forward-growing and younger end of the rhizome and another containing the older end. Both compartments were either watered (control) or the older one was left un-watered (drought treatment) to trigger rhizome senescence and potential carbohydrate translocation. Plant growth, root traits, and non-structural carbohydrate types and concentrations were assessed in four sequential harvests.Drought treatment plants had higher rhizome dry matter content. Younger rhizome parts produced higher new rhizome and above-ground biomass than older rhizome parts. Carbohydrate concentrations in rhizomes remained consistent for both treatments, younger and older rhizome parts, and all harvests, probably because of the translocation of water from the watered to the dry compartment to prevent senescence and rhizome loss.Contrary to expectations, the experimental treatment did not trigger rhizome senescence: plants responded by conserving the rhizome and resources within, rather than by losing their older parts. The invariant composition and concentration of carbohydrates within the rhizome suggest that rhizomes are essential plant organs and the storage carbohydrates they contain are necessary for regrowth after stress.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Trash or treasure: Rhizome conservation during drought

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The role of storage carbohydrates in plant carbon economy is currently disputed as possibly passive accumulation when other resources are limiting growth, or part of a conservative growth strategy as insurance for regrowth and stress response. One indication may be the fate of carbohydrates in senescing rhizomes, as either translocated to be retained in the live and growing end of the rhizome or kept within the senescing rhizome end and lost into the soil for it to decompose.To examine carbohydrate storage in senescing rhizomes, eight rhizomatous species were grown in a split-pot design with one compartment containing the forward-growing and younger end of the rhizome and another containing the older end. Both compartments were either watered (control) or the older one was left un-watered (drought treatment) to trigger rhizome senescence and potential carbohydrate translocation. Plant growth, root traits, and non-structural carbohydrate types and concentrations were assessed in four sequential harvests.Drought treatment plants had higher rhizome dry matter content. Younger rhizome parts produced higher new rhizome and above-ground biomass than older rhizome parts. Carbohydrate concentrations in rhizomes remained consistent for both treatments, younger and older rhizome parts, and all harvests, probably because of the translocation of water from the watered to the dry compartment to prevent senescence and rhizome loss.Contrary to expectations, the experimental treatment did not trigger rhizome senescence: plants responded by conserving the rhizome and resources within, rather than by losing their older parts. The invariant composition and concentration of carbohydrates within the rhizome suggest that rhizomes are essential plant organs and the storage carbohydrates they contain are necessary for regrowth after stress.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10618 - Ecology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA22-10897S" target="_blank" >GA22-10897S: Klonalita u rostlin: neznámý zdroj diverzity společenstev i diverzifikace zásobníku druhů</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2023

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Functional Ecology

  • ISSN

    0269-8463

  • e-ISSN

    1365-2435

  • Svazek periodika

    37

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    9

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    12

  • Strana od-do

    2300-2311

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001014630400001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85162938013